Araştırma Çıktıları | WoS | Scopus | TR-Dizin | PubMed
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14719/1741
Browse
151 results
Search Results
Publication Metadata only A Review of Methods for the Preservation of Laryngeal Nerves During Thyroidectomy(KARE PUBL, 2018) Uludag, Mehmet; Tanal, Mert; Isgor, Adnan; University of Health Sciences Turkey; Bahcesehir University; Memorial Healthcare GroupPublication Metadata only Standards and Definitions in Neck Dissections of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer(YERKURE TANITIM YAYINCILIK HIZMETLERI AS, 2018) Uludag, Mehmet; Tanal, Mert; Isgor, Adnan; Istanbul Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training & Research Hospital; Bahcesehir University; Memorial Healthcare GroupPublication Metadata only Game Play Rules Gore: Aysegul Kilic a response(ISTANBUL 29 MAYIS UNIV & ISAM, 2014) Lowry, Heath W.; Bahcesehir UniversityPublication Metadata only Survey of Data Mining and Applications (Review from 1996 to Now)(INTECH EUROPE, 2012) Karahoca, Adem; Karahoca, Dilek; Sanver, Mert; Karahoca, A; Bahcesehir University; Near East UniversityPublication Metadata only THE TURKISH STRAITS SYSTEM AS A PHYLOGEOGRAPHIC BOUNDARY - A LITERATURE REVIEW(TURKISH MARINE RESEARCH FOUNDATION-TUDAV, 2016) Kalkan, Evrim; Karhan, Selahattin Unsal; Bilgin, Rasit; Hemond, Elizabeth M.; Ozsoy, E; Cagatay, MN; Balkis, N; Balkis, N; Ozturk, B; Turkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Arastirma Kurumu (TUBITAK); Istanbul University; Bogazici University; Bahcesehir UniversityPublication Metadata only Translating Biotechnology to Knowledge-Based Innovation, Peace, and Development? Deploy a Science Peace Corps-An Open Letter to World Leaders(MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC, 2014) Hekim, Nezih; Coskun, Yavuz; Sinav, Ahmet; Abou-Zeid, Alaa H.; Agirbasli, Mehmet; Akintola, Simisola O.; Aynacioglu, Sukru; Bayram, Mustafa; Bragazzi, Nicola Luigi; Dandara, Collet; Dereli, Turkay; Dove, Edward S.; Elbeyli, Levent; Endrenyi, Laszlo; Erciyas, Kamile; Faris, Jack; Ferguson, Lynnette R.; Gogus, Fahrettin; Gungor, Kivanc; Gursoy, Mervi; Gursoy, Ulvi K.; Karaomerlioglu, M. Asim; Kickbusch, Ilona; Kilic, Turker; Kilinc, Metin; Kocagoz, Tanil; Lin, Biaoyang; LLerena, Adrian; Manolopoulos, Vangelis G.; Nair, Bipin; Ozkan, Bulent; Pang, Tikki; Sardas, Semra; Srivastava, Sanjeeva; Toraman, Cengiz; Ustun, Kemal; Warnich, Louise; Wonkam, Ambroise; Yakicier, Mustafa Cengiz; Yasar, Umit; Ozdemir, Vural; Sanko University; Sanko University; Bogazici University; Bogazici University; Gaziantep University; Gaziantep University; Gaziantep University; Gaziantep University; Gaziantep University; Gaziantep University; Gaziantep University; Gaziantep University; Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB); Cairo University; Marmara University; Marmara University; University of Ibadan; University of Genoa; University of Cape Town; University of Toronto; University of Auckland; Gaziantep University; Gaziantep University; University of Turku; Bahcesehir University; Acibadem University; Acibadem University; University of Washington; University of Washington Seattle; Swedish Medical Center; Zhejiang University; Universidad de Extremadura; University Hospital Extremadura; Democritus University of Thrace; Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham; National University of Singapore; Indian Institute of Technology System (IIT System); Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) - Bombay; Stellenbosch University; Hacettepe UniversityScholarship knows no geographical boundaries. This science diplomacy and biotechnology journalism article introduces an original concept and policy petition to innovate the global translational science, a Science Peace Corps. Service at the new Corps could entail volunteer work for a minimum of 6 weeks, and up to a maximum of 2 years, for translational research in any region of the world to build capacity manifestly for development and peace, instead of the narrow bench-to-bedside model of life science translation. Topics for translational research are envisioned to include all fields of life sciences and medicine, as long as they are linked to potential or concrete endpoints in development, foreign policy, conflict management, post-crisis capacity building, and/or peace scholarship domains. As a new instrument in the global science and technology governance toolbox, a Science Peace Corps could work effectively, for example, towards elucidating the emerging concept of one health-encompassing human, environmental, plant, microbial, ecosystem, and planet health-thus serving as an innovative crosscutting pillar of 21st century integrative biology. An interdisciplinary program of this caliber for development would link 21st century life sciences to foreign policy and peace, in ways that can benefit many nations despite their ideological differences. We note that a Science Peace Corps is timely. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) of the United Nations released the Fifth Assessment Report on March 31, 2014. Worrisomely, the report underscores that no person or nation will remain untouched by the climate change, highlighting the shared pressing life sciences challenges for global society. To this end, we recall that President John F. Kennedy advocated for volunteer work that has enduring, transgenerational, and global impacts. This culminated in establishment of the Peace Corps in 1961. Earlier, President Abraham Lincoln aptly observed, nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power. We therefore petition President Barack Obama, other world leaders, and international development agencies in positions of power around the globe, to consider deploying a Science Peace Corps to cultivate the essential (and presently missing) ties among life sciences, foreign policy, development, and peace agendas. A Science Peace Corps requires support by a credible and independent intergovernmental organization or development agency for funding, and arbitration in the course of volunteer work when the global versus local (glocal) value-based priorities and human rights intersect in synergy or conflict. In all, Science Peace Corps is an invitation to a new pathway for competence in 21st century science that is locally productive and globally competitive. It can open up scientific institutions to broader considerations and broader inputs, and thus cultivate vital translational science in a world sorely in need of solidarity and sustainable responses to the challenges of 21st century science and society.Publication Metadata only Lupus Miliaris Disseminatus Faciei: A Case Report and Brief Literature Review(YERKURE TANITIM YAYINCILIK HIZMETLERI AS, 2018) Cerman, Asli Aksu; Karabay, Ezgi Aktas; Yalcin, Ozben; Altunay, Ilknur Kivanc; Istanbul Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training & Research Hospital; Istanbul Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training & Research Hospital; Bahcesehir UniversityPublication Metadata only Translating Biotechnology to Knowledge-Based Innovation, Peace, and Development? Deploy a Science Peace Corps-An Open Letter to World Leaders(MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC, 2014) Hekim, Nezih; Coskun, Yavuz; Sinav, Ahmet; Abou-Zeid, Alaa H.; Agirbasli, Mehmet; Akintola, Simisola O.; Aynacioglu, Sukru; Bayram, Mustafa; Bragazzi, Nicola Luigi; Dandara, Collet; Dereli, Turkay; Dove, Edward S.; Elbeyli, Levent; Endrenyi, Laszlo; Erciyas, Kamile; Faris, Jack; Ferguson, Lynnette R.; Gogus, Fahrettin; Gungor, Kivanc; Gursoy, Mervi; Gursoy, Ulvi K.; Karaomerlioglu, M. Asim; Kickbusch, Ilona; Kilic, Turker; Kilinc, Metin; Kocagoz, Tanil; Lin, Biaoyang; LLerena, Adrian; Manolopoulos, Vangelis G.; Nair, Bipin; Ozkan, Bulent; Pang, Tikki; Sardas, Semra; Srivastava, Sanjeeva; Toraman, Cengiz; Ustun, Kemal; Warnich, Louise; Wonkam, Ambroise; Yakicier, Mustafa Cengiz; Yasar, Umit; Ozdemir, Vural; Sanko University; Sanko University; Bogazici University; Bogazici University; Gaziantep University; Gaziantep University; Gaziantep University; Gaziantep University; Gaziantep University; Gaziantep University; Gaziantep University; Gaziantep University; Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB); Cairo University; Marmara University; Marmara University; University of Ibadan; University of Genoa; University of Cape Town; University of Toronto; University of Auckland; Gaziantep University; Gaziantep University; University of Turku; Bahcesehir University; Acibadem University; Acibadem University; University of Washington; University of Washington Seattle; Swedish Medical Center; Zhejiang University; Universidad de Extremadura; University Hospital Extremadura; Democritus University of Thrace; Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham; National University of Singapore; Indian Institute of Technology System (IIT System); Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) - Bombay; Stellenbosch University; Hacettepe UniversityScholarship knows no geographical boundaries. This science diplomacy and biotechnology journalism article introduces an original concept and policy petition to innovate the global translational science, a Science Peace Corps. Service at the new Corps could entail volunteer work for a minimum of 6 weeks, and up to a maximum of 2 years, for translational research in any region of the world to build capacity manifestly for development and peace, instead of the narrow bench-to-bedside model of life science translation. Topics for translational research are envisioned to include all fields of life sciences and medicine, as long as they are linked to potential or concrete endpoints in development, foreign policy, conflict management, post-crisis capacity building, and/or peace scholarship domains. As a new instrument in the global science and technology governance toolbox, a Science Peace Corps could work effectively, for example, towards elucidating the emerging concept of one health-encompassing human, environmental, plant, microbial, ecosystem, and planet health-thus serving as an innovative crosscutting pillar of 21st century integrative biology. An interdisciplinary program of this caliber for development would link 21st century life sciences to foreign policy and peace, in ways that can benefit many nations despite their ideological differences. We note that a Science Peace Corps is timely. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) of the United Nations released the Fifth Assessment Report on March 31, 2014. Worrisomely, the report underscores that no person or nation will remain untouched by the climate change, highlighting the shared pressing life sciences challenges for global society. To this end, we recall that President John F. Kennedy advocated for volunteer work that has enduring, transgenerational, and global impacts. This culminated in establishment of the Peace Corps in 1961. Earlier, President Abraham Lincoln aptly observed, nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power. We therefore petition President Barack Obama, other world leaders, and international development agencies in positions of power around the globe, to consider deploying a Science Peace Corps to cultivate the essential (and presently missing) ties among life sciences, foreign policy, development, and peace agendas. A Science Peace Corps requires support by a credible and independent intergovernmental organization or development agency for funding, and arbitration in the course of volunteer work when the global versus local (glocal) value-based priorities and human rights intersect in synergy or conflict. In all, Science Peace Corps is an invitation to a new pathway for competence in 21st century science that is locally productive and globally competitive. It can open up scientific institutions to broader considerations and broader inputs, and thus cultivate vital translational science in a world sorely in need of solidarity and sustainable responses to the challenges of 21st century science and society.Publication Metadata only Primary Patency With Stenting Versus Balloon Angioplasty for Arteriovenous Graft Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis(H M P COMMUNICATIONS, 2019) Marmagkiolis, Konstantinos; Iliescu, Cezar; Edupuganti, Mohan Mallikarjuna Rao; Saad, Marwan; Boudoulas, Konstantinos Dean; Gupta, Akash; Lontos, Nikolaos; Cilingiroglu, Mehmet; Adventist Health Services; AdventHealth; (AdventHealth) West Florida Division; West Florida Hospital; AdventHealth Tampa; University of Texas System; UTMD Anderson Cancer Center; University of Texas Health Science Center Houston; University of Arkansas System; University of Arkansas Medical Sciences; Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB); Ain Shams University; University System of Ohio; Ohio State University; Baylor College of Medicine; Bahcesehir UniversityObjectives. To evaluate the efficacy of advanced stent technology in the management of failing arteriovenous grafts (AVGs). Background. End-stage renal disease rates and the need for hemodialysis are increasing worldwide. AVG remains a common dialysis access site. Several techniques have been previously suggested to restore and preserve AVG patency. A quantitative evaluation and synthesis of this information are essential in elucidating the role of newer stent platforms for the management of failing AVG. Methods. We performed a literature search using PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase from January 2006 to December 2017. Studies comparing the primary patency rates with stent placement vs balloon angioplasty alone in patients with failed AVGs were included. Results. Seven studies with a total of 1109 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean graft age was 2.89 years in the stent group and 3.29 years in the balloon angioplasty group. Stent placement was associated with improved primary patency rates compared with balloon angioplasty alone at short-term (3-month) follow-up (73.2% vs 42.6%, respectively, risk ratio [RR], 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35-0.88, P=.01) and mid-term (6-month) follow-up (50.8% vs 18.4%, respectively, RR, 0.65, 95% CI, 0.51-0.82, P<.001). The primary patency rates remained favorable with stent placement at 12-month (40.3% vs 13.0%, respectively, RR, 0.69, 95% CI, 0.63-0.77, P<.001) and 24-month follow-up (20.5% vs 6.8%, RR, 0.86, 95% CI, 0.80-0.92, P<.001) compared with balloon angioplasty alone. Conclusions. Stent placement is associated with improved patency rates compared with balloon angioplasty alone.Publication Metadata only The Onco-cardiologist Dilemma: to Implant, to Defer, or to Avoid Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Cancer Patients with Aortic Stenosis?(SPRINGER, 2019) Balanescu, Serban Mihai; Balanescu, Dinu Valentin; Donisan, Teodora; Yang, Eric H.; Palaskas, Nicolas; Lopez-Mattei, Juan; Hassan, Saamir; Kim, Peter; Cilingiroglu, Mehmet; Marmagkiolis, Konstantinos; Kar, Biswajit; Iliescu, Cezar; Carol Davila University of Medicine & Pharmacy; University of Texas System; UTMD Anderson Cancer Center; University of California System; University of California Los Angeles; Bahcesehir University; Adventist Health Services; AdventHealth; (AdventHealth) West Florida Division; West Florida Hospital; AdventHealth Pepin Heart Institute; University of Texas System; University of Texas Health Science Center HoustonPurpose of ReviewAging is associated with an increased prevalence of both cancer and heart disease. The progression of aortic valve calcification to aortic stenosis may be accelerated by both cardiovascular risk factors and cancer treatments, such as radiotherapy with mediastinal involvement. Symptomatic aortic stenosis is occasionally diagnosed in cancer patients undergoing cardiovascular evaluation, likewise, cancer is often recognized during assessment preceding aortic valve interventions. In these complex cases, physicians face difficult treatment decisions. Due to a myriad of clinical presentations of cancer and valve disease, specific guidelines for this patient population are not currently in place. Management is currently based on clinical judgment, on an individual basis.Recent FindingsPatients with cancer in remission or with a favorable prognosis should be treated according to current cardiovascular guidelines. In these patients, aortic valve replacement can be performed either by surgery or transcatheter. Significant challenges arise in patients with active cancer, especially those receiving anti-cancer treatment. Recent data suggests that these patients can be offered aortic valve replacement, with a trend of favoring the transcatheter route in order to minimize perioperative risk and complications associated with major surgery. Patients with advanced cancer and severe aortic stenosis should be offered palliative care and can benefit from aortic balloon valvuloplasty if indicated. Modern cancer treatments associated with improved long-term prognosis may allow the appropriate cure of aortic stenosis.SummaryWe discuss the protocol, outcomes, and evolving recommendations of aortic valve replacement in cancer patients with aortic stenosis.