Araştırma Çıktıları | WoS | Scopus | TR-Dizin | PubMed

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14719/1741

Browse

Start date: 2010End date: 2019Type: search.filters.itemtype.ReviewHas files: NoSubject: search.filters.subject.HumanAuthor: search.filters.author.Bayoumi, Ahmed B.

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    PublicationMetadata only
    Posterior Rigid Instrumentation of C7: Surgical Considerations and Biomechanics at the Cervicothoracic Junction. A Review of the Literature
    (Elsevier Inc. [email protected], 2018) Bayoumi, Ahmed B.; Efe, Ibrahim Efecan; Berk, Selim; Kasper, Ekkehard Matthias; Toktaş, Zafer Orkun; Konya, Deniz; Bayoumi, Ahmed B., Department of Neurosurgery, Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi, Istanbul, Turkey; Efe, Ibrahim Efecan, Department of Neurosurgery, Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi, Istanbul, Turkey, Department of Neurosurgery, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Berk, Selim, Department of Neurosurgery, Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi, Istanbul, Turkey; Kasper, Ekkehard Matthias, Division of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States; Toktaş, Zafer Orkun, Department of Neurosurgery, Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi, Istanbul, Turkey; Konya, Deniz, Department of Neurosurgery, Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi, Istanbul, Turkey
    Background: The cervicothoracic junction is a challenging anatomic transition in spine surgery. It is commonly affected by different types of diseases that may significantly impair stability in this region. The seventh cervical vertebra (C7) is an atypical cervical vertebra with unique anatomic features compared to subaxial cervical spine (C3 to C6). C7 has relatively broader laminae, larger pedicles, smaller lateral masses, and a long nonbifid spinous process. These features allow a variety of surgical methods for performing posterior rigid instrumentation in the form of different types of screws, such as lateral mass screws, pedicle screws, transfacet screws, and intralaminar screws. Many biomechanical studies on cadavers have evaluated and compared different types of implants at C7. Methods: We reviewed PubMed/Medline by using specific combinations of keywords to summarize previously published articles that examined C7 posterior rigid instrumentation thoroughly in an experimental fashion on patients or cadavers with additional descriptive radiologic parameters for evaluation of the optimum surgical technique for each type. Results: A total of 44 articles were reported, including 22 articles that discussed anatomic considerations (entry points, sagittal and axial trajectories, and features of screws) and another 22 articles that discussed the relevant biomechanical testing at this transitional region if C7 was directly involved in terms of receiving posterior rigid implants. Conclusions: C7 can accommodate different types of screws, which can provide additional benefits and risks based on availability of bony purchase, awareness of surgical technique, biomechanics, and anatomic considerations. © 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    PublicationMetadata only
    Meningiomas in pregnancy: timing of surgery and clinical outcomes as observed in 104 cases and establishment of a best management strategy
    (Springer-Verlag Wien [email protected], 2018) Laviv, Yosef; Bayoumi, Ahmed B.; Mahadevan, Anand; Young, Brett C.; Boone, Myles Dustin; Kasper, Ekkehard Matthias; Laviv, Yosef, Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States; Bayoumi, Ahmed B., Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States, Department of Neurosurgery, Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi, Istanbul, Turkey; Mahadevan, Anand, Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States; Young, Brett C., Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine/Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States; Boone, Myles Dustin, Department of Anesthesiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States; Kasper, Ekkehard Matthias, Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Background: There is a strong correlation between the level of circulating female sex hormones and the parturient growth of meningiomas. As a result, rapid changes in meningioma size occur during pregnancy, putting both the mother and fetus at risk. Large, symptomatic meningiomas require surgical resection, regardless of the status of pregnancy. However, the preferred timing of such complex intervention is a matter of debate. The rarity of this clinical scenario and the absence of prospective trials make it difficult to reach evidence-based conclusions. The aim of this study was to create evidence-based management guidelines for timing of surgery for pregnancy-related intracranial meningiomas. Method: The English literature from 1990 to 2016 was systematically reviewed according to PRISMA guidelines for all surgical cases of pregnancy–related intracranial meningiomas. Cases were divided into two groups: patients who have had surgery during pregnancy and delivered thereafter (group A) and patients who delivered first (group B). Groups were compared for demographic, clinical and radiological features, as well as for neurosurgical, obstetrical and neonatological outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed to assess differences. Results: A total of 104 surgical cases were identified and reviewed, of which 86 were suitable for comparison and statistical analysis. Thirty-five patients (40%) underwent craniotomy for resection during pregnancy or at delivery (group A) and 51 patients (60%) underwent surgery after delivery (group B). Groups showed no significant differences in characteristics such as age at diagnosis, number of gestations, presenting symptoms, tumor site and tumor size. Despite a comparable distribution over the gestational trimesters, group A had significantly more patients diagnosed prior to the 27th gestational week (46 vs 17.5%, p = 0.0075). Group A was also associated with a significantly higher rate of both emergent craniotomies (40 vs 19.6%, p = 0.0048) and emergent Caesarian deliveries (47 vs 17.8%, p = 0.00481). The time from diagnosis to surgery was significantly longer in group B (11 weeks vs 1 week in group A, p = 0.0013). The rate of premature delivery was high but similar in both groups (∼70%). Risks of maternal mortality or fetal mortality were associated with group A (odds ratio = 14.7), but did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: While surgical resection of meningioma during pregnancy may be associated with increased maternal and fetal mortalities, the overall neurosurgical, obstetrical and neonatological outcomes, as well as many clinical characteristics, are similar to patients undergoing resection postpartum. We believe that fetal survival chances have a significant impact on decision-making, as patients diagnosed at a later stage in pregnancy (≥27th week of gestation) were more likely to undergo delivery first. This complicated clinical scenario requires the close cooperation of multiple disciplines. While the mother’s health and well-being should always be paramount in guiding management, we hope that the overall good outcomes observed by this systematic review will encourage colleagues to aim for term pregnancies whenever possible in order to reduce prematurity-related problems. © 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.