Publication:
Low Prevalence of Fragrance Contact Allergy Among Turkish Population: A 24-Year, Cross-Sectional, Tertiary Single-Center, Retrospective Study

dc.contributor.authorÖzkaya, Esen
dc.contributor.authorKılıç Sayar, Sıla
dc.contributor.institutionÖzkaya, Esen, Department of Dermatology and Venereology, İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi, Istanbul, Turkey
dc.contributor.institutionKılıç Sayar, Sıla, Department of Dermatology and Venereology, İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi, Istanbul, Turkey, Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi, Istanbul, Turkey
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-05T15:15:01Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractBackground Limited data exist on fragrance contact allergy among Turkish population. Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency and characteristics of fragrance contact allergy in Turkey. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 2566 patients consecutively patch tested with the European baseline series and additionally with a fragrance series (n = 358) at a tertiary referral center between 1996 and 2019. Results One hundred sixty-three patients (6.4%) (male/female, 1.5:1) were sensitized with at least 1 fragrance allergen. Fragrance mix (FM) I was most frequently positive (3.9%), followed by Myroxylon pereirae (3.1%), FM II (2%), and hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (0.5%), the latter exclusively positive in FM II-positive patients. Among 358 patients patch tested with a fragrance series, positive patch test reactions were observed in 38 patients, including 8 who did not react to baseline fragrance markers. Clinically relevant fragrance allergy was established in 128 patients (78.5%) from nonoccupational (72.4%) and occupational (6.1%) sources. Conclusions The low prevalence, the middle-aged male preponderance, and the predominant involvement of hands were unusual findings. Rose/citrus-flavored perfumes and eau de cologne, which are traditionally preferred in our country, were important elicitors of fragrance contact allergy, especially among middle-aged and older men. © 2022 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/DER.0000000000000822
dc.identifier.endpage381
dc.identifier.issn17103568
dc.identifier.issn21625220
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.pubmed34882115
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85138450741
dc.identifier.startpage373
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/DER.0000000000000822
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14719/8629
dc.identifier.volume33
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer Health
dc.relation.sourceDermatitis
dc.subject.authorkeywordsCoumarin
dc.subject.authorkeywordsLimonene
dc.subject.authorkeywordsAllergens
dc.subject.authorkeywordsPerfume
dc.subject.authorkeywordsAllergen
dc.subject.authorkeywordsCoumarin
dc.subject.authorkeywordsEssential Oil
dc.subject.authorkeywordsFragrance
dc.subject.authorkeywordsLimonene
dc.subject.authorkeywordsPerfume
dc.subject.authorkeywordsAdolescent
dc.subject.authorkeywordsAdult
dc.subject.authorkeywordsAged
dc.subject.authorkeywordsAllergic Contact Dermatitis
dc.subject.authorkeywordsAllergy
dc.subject.authorkeywordsAnise
dc.subject.authorkeywordsArticle
dc.subject.authorkeywordsAtopic Dermatitis
dc.subject.authorkeywordsAtopy
dc.subject.authorkeywordsChild
dc.subject.authorkeywordsCitrus
dc.subject.authorkeywordsCohort Analysis
dc.subject.authorkeywordsContact Allergy
dc.subject.authorkeywordsCymbopogon Flexuosus
dc.subject.authorkeywordsDisease Duration
dc.subject.authorkeywordsFemale
dc.subject.authorkeywordsFollow Up
dc.subject.authorkeywordsFragrance Allergy
dc.subject.authorkeywordsFruit
dc.subject.authorkeywordsHuman
dc.subject.authorkeywordsLaurus Nobilis
dc.subject.authorkeywordsLavandula Angustifolia
dc.subject.authorkeywordsMajor Clinical Study
dc.subject.authorkeywordsMale
dc.subject.authorkeywordsMyroxylon
dc.subject.authorkeywordsNonhuman
dc.subject.authorkeywordsPatch Test
dc.subject.authorkeywordsPrevalence
dc.subject.authorkeywordsPrick Test
dc.subject.authorkeywordsRetrospective Study
dc.subject.authorkeywordsRosa Damascena
dc.subject.authorkeywordsSkin Biopsy
dc.subject.authorkeywordsSkin Disease
dc.subject.authorkeywordsStaphylococcus Aureus
dc.subject.authorkeywordsTertiary Care Center
dc.subject.authorkeywordsTurk (people)
dc.subject.authorkeywordsTurkey (republic)
dc.subject.authorkeywordsCross-sectional Study
dc.subject.authorkeywordsTurkey (bird)
dc.subject.authorkeywordsAllergens
dc.subject.authorkeywordsCross-sectional Studies
dc.subject.authorkeywordsDermatitis, Allergic Contact
dc.subject.authorkeywordsFemale
dc.subject.authorkeywordsHumans
dc.subject.authorkeywordsMale
dc.subject.authorkeywordsOdorants
dc.subject.authorkeywordsPatch Tests
dc.subject.authorkeywordsPerfume
dc.subject.authorkeywordsPrevalence
dc.subject.authorkeywordsRetrospective Studies
dc.subject.authorkeywordsTurkey
dc.subject.indexkeywordsallergen
dc.subject.indexkeywordscoumarin
dc.subject.indexkeywordsessential oil
dc.subject.indexkeywordsfragrance
dc.subject.indexkeywordslimonene
dc.subject.indexkeywordsperfume
dc.subject.indexkeywordsadolescent
dc.subject.indexkeywordsadult
dc.subject.indexkeywordsaged
dc.subject.indexkeywordsallergic contact dermatitis
dc.subject.indexkeywordsallergy
dc.subject.indexkeywordsanise
dc.subject.indexkeywordsArticle
dc.subject.indexkeywordsatopic dermatitis
dc.subject.indexkeywordsatopy
dc.subject.indexkeywordschild
dc.subject.indexkeywordsCitrus
dc.subject.indexkeywordscohort analysis
dc.subject.indexkeywordscontact allergy
dc.subject.indexkeywordsCymbopogon flexuosus
dc.subject.indexkeywordsdisease duration
dc.subject.indexkeywordsfemale
dc.subject.indexkeywordsfollow up
dc.subject.indexkeywordsfragrance allergy
dc.subject.indexkeywordsfruit
dc.subject.indexkeywordshuman
dc.subject.indexkeywordsLaurus nobilis
dc.subject.indexkeywordsLavandula angustifolia
dc.subject.indexkeywordsmajor clinical study
dc.subject.indexkeywordsmale
dc.subject.indexkeywordsMyroxylon
dc.subject.indexkeywordsnonhuman
dc.subject.indexkeywordspatch test
dc.subject.indexkeywordsprevalence
dc.subject.indexkeywordsprick test
dc.subject.indexkeywordsretrospective study
dc.subject.indexkeywordsRosa damascena
dc.subject.indexkeywordsskin biopsy
dc.subject.indexkeywordsskin disease
dc.subject.indexkeywordsStaphylococcus aureus
dc.subject.indexkeywordstertiary care center
dc.subject.indexkeywordsTurk (people)
dc.subject.indexkeywordsTurkey (republic)
dc.subject.indexkeywordscross-sectional study
dc.subject.indexkeywordsturkey (bird)
dc.subject.indexkeywordsAllergens
dc.subject.indexkeywordsCross-Sectional Studies
dc.subject.indexkeywordsDermatitis, Allergic Contact
dc.subject.indexkeywordsFemale
dc.subject.indexkeywordsHumans
dc.subject.indexkeywordsMale
dc.subject.indexkeywordsOdorants
dc.subject.indexkeywordsPatch Tests
dc.subject.indexkeywordsPerfume
dc.subject.indexkeywordsPrevalence
dc.subject.indexkeywordsRetrospective Studies
dc.subject.indexkeywordsTurkey
dc.titleLow Prevalence of Fragrance Contact Allergy Among Turkish Population: A 24-Year, Cross-Sectional, Tertiary Single-Center, Retrospective Study
dc.typeArticle
dcterms.referencesDiepgen, Thomas Ludwig, Prevalence of contact allergy in the general population in different European regions, British Journal of Dermatology, 174, 2, pp. 319-329, (2016), Uter, Wolfgang J.C., Patch test results with the European baseline series and additions thereof in the ESSCA network, 2015-2018, Contact Dermatitis, 84, 2, pp. 109-120, (2021), Bruze, Magnus, Recommendation to include fragrance mix 2 and hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (Lyral®) in the European baseline patch test series, Contact Dermatitis, 58, 3, pp. 129-133, (2008), Official Journal of the European Union, (2003), Johansen, Jeanne Duus, European Society of Contact Dermatitis guideline for diagnostic patch testing - Recommendations on best practice, Contact Dermatitis, 73, 4, pp. 195-221, (2015), Acta Derm Venereol Stockh, (1980), Diepgen, Thomas Ludwig, Criteria of Atopic Skin Diathesis, Dermatosen in Beruf und Umwelt. Occupation and environment, 39, 3, pp. 79-83, (1991), Uter, Wolfgang J.C., The 'overall yield' with the baseline series - A useful addition to the array of MOAHLFA factors describing departmental characteristics of patch tested patients, Contact Dermatitis, 65, 6, pp. 322-328, (2011), Toby Mathias, C. G., Contact dermatitis and workers' compensation: Criteria for establishing occupational causation and aggravation, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 20, 5, pp. 842-848, (1989), Özkaya, Esen, Cinnamon-induced airborne occupational allergic contact dermatitis in a baker: Severe flare-up during patch testing, Contact Dermatitis, 80, 6, pp. 405-407, (2019)
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.indexed.atScopus
person.identifier.scopus-author-id23390697300
person.identifier.scopus-author-id57189620200

Files