Publication:
Magnetically controlled growing rod in early-onset scoliosis: A minimum of 2-year follow-up

dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Baran
dc.contributor.authorEkşi̇, Murat Şakir
dc.contributor.authorIşik, Semra
dc.contributor.authorÖzcan-Ekşi̇, Emel Ece
dc.contributor.authorToktaş, Zafer Orkun
dc.contributor.authorKonya, Deniz
dc.contributor.institutionYilmaz, Baran, Department of Neurosurgery, Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi, Istanbul, Turkey
dc.contributor.institutionEkşi̇, Murat Şakir, UCSF Medical Center, San Francisco, United States
dc.contributor.institutionIşik, Semra, Labatt Brain Tumour Research Centre, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
dc.contributor.institutionÖzcan-Ekşi̇, Emel Ece, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Antalya Ataturk State Hospital, Antakya, Turkey
dc.contributor.institutionToktaş, Zafer Orkun, Department of Neurosurgery, Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi, Istanbul, Turkey
dc.contributor.institutionKonya, Deniz, Department of Neurosurgery, Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi, Istanbul, Turkey
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-05T16:23:46Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The magnetically controlled growing rod technique decreases complications, costs, and loss of functionality by avoiding successive surgical corrections every 6 months in patients with early-onset scoliosis. However, only a few studies have presented clinical experience with the magnetically controlled growing rod. In this study we aimed to present our single-center experience in patients with early-onset scoliosis who underwent the magnetically controlled growing rod technique and follow-up for at least 2 years. Materials and Methods: We made an observational study by evaluating patients with early-onset scoliosis who underwent the magnetically controlled growing rod technique between February 2012 and December 2013. Demographic and clinical data were obtained from the patients charts. We included patients who were followed up for at least 2 years. Radiological data were obtained from plain anterior-posterior and lateral scoliosis X-rays. Results: Eight patients with early-onset scoliosis who underwent surgery using the magnetic system were treated with dual rods. None of the spines were fused to the sacrum. We observed no intra- and/or postsurgical complications. The average number of external rod lengthenings was 7.6. The average amount of lengthening was 30.6 mm on the right side and 27.8 mm on the left side by the time of last clinical follow-up. The average coronal and sagittal Cobb values at the final clinical evaluation were 10.5° (thoracic coronal), 13.75° (lumbar coronal), 6.25° (lumbosacral coronal), 24.5° (thoracic sagittal), and 40° (lumbar sagittal), respectively. Conclusions: The magnetically controlled growing rod is beneficial in early-onset scoliosis, since it enables spinal growth and decreases additional surgeries, complications, and costs. Even though we had a small sample size, our follow-up period was enough to declare long-term outcomes of our patients. Multicenter and large sample-sized studies are needed to make more conclusive statements regarding this promising scoliosis treatment approach. © 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doi10.1159/000448048
dc.identifier.endpage296
dc.identifier.issn14230305
dc.identifier.issn10162291
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.pubmed27497928
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84981492557
dc.identifier.startpage292
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1159/000448048
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14719/12354
dc.identifier.volume51
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherS. Karger AG
dc.relation.sourcePediatric Neurosurgery
dc.subject.authorkeywordsEarly-onset Scoliosis
dc.subject.authorkeywordsGrowing Rod
dc.subject.authorkeywordsMagnetic System
dc.subject.authorkeywordsArticle
dc.subject.authorkeywordsClinical Article
dc.subject.authorkeywordsClinical Evaluation
dc.subject.authorkeywordsControlled Study
dc.subject.authorkeywordsEarly Onset Scoliosis
dc.subject.authorkeywordsEquipment Design
dc.subject.authorkeywordsFemale
dc.subject.authorkeywordsFollow Up
dc.subject.authorkeywordsHuman
dc.subject.authorkeywordsMagnetically Controlled Growing Rod
dc.subject.authorkeywordsMale
dc.subject.authorkeywordsObservational Study
dc.subject.authorkeywordsOrthopedic Therapeutic Device
dc.subject.authorkeywordsOutcome Assessment
dc.subject.authorkeywordsPriority Journal
dc.subject.authorkeywordsScoliosis
dc.subject.authorkeywordsSpine Radiography
dc.subject.authorkeywordsX Ray
dc.subject.authorkeywordsBone Nail
dc.subject.authorkeywordsChild
dc.subject.authorkeywordsDevices
dc.subject.authorkeywordsDiagnostic Imaging
dc.subject.authorkeywordsLumbar Vertebra
dc.subject.authorkeywordsMagnetism
dc.subject.authorkeywordsProcedures
dc.subject.authorkeywordsThoracic Vertebra
dc.subject.authorkeywordsTime Factor
dc.subject.authorkeywordsBone Nails
dc.subject.authorkeywordsChild
dc.subject.authorkeywordsFemale
dc.subject.authorkeywordsFollow-up Studies
dc.subject.authorkeywordsHumans
dc.subject.authorkeywordsLumbar Vertebrae
dc.subject.authorkeywordsMagnetics
dc.subject.authorkeywordsMale
dc.subject.authorkeywordsScoliosis
dc.subject.authorkeywordsThoracic Vertebrae
dc.subject.authorkeywordsTime Factors
dc.subject.indexkeywordsArticle
dc.subject.indexkeywordsclinical article
dc.subject.indexkeywordsclinical evaluation
dc.subject.indexkeywordscontrolled study
dc.subject.indexkeywordsearly onset scoliosis
dc.subject.indexkeywordsequipment design
dc.subject.indexkeywordsfemale
dc.subject.indexkeywordsfollow up
dc.subject.indexkeywordshuman
dc.subject.indexkeywordsmagnetically controlled growing rod
dc.subject.indexkeywordsmale
dc.subject.indexkeywordsobservational study
dc.subject.indexkeywordsorthopedic therapeutic device
dc.subject.indexkeywordsoutcome assessment
dc.subject.indexkeywordspriority journal
dc.subject.indexkeywordsscoliosis
dc.subject.indexkeywordsspine radiography
dc.subject.indexkeywordsX ray
dc.subject.indexkeywordsbone nail
dc.subject.indexkeywordschild
dc.subject.indexkeywordsdevices
dc.subject.indexkeywordsdiagnostic imaging
dc.subject.indexkeywordslumbar vertebra
dc.subject.indexkeywordsmagnetism
dc.subject.indexkeywordsprocedures
dc.subject.indexkeywordsthoracic vertebra
dc.subject.indexkeywordstime factor
dc.subject.indexkeywordsBone Nails
dc.subject.indexkeywordsChild
dc.subject.indexkeywordsFemale
dc.subject.indexkeywordsFollow-Up Studies
dc.subject.indexkeywordsHumans
dc.subject.indexkeywordsLumbar Vertebrae
dc.subject.indexkeywordsMagnetics
dc.subject.indexkeywordsMale
dc.subject.indexkeywordsScoliosis
dc.subject.indexkeywordsThoracic Vertebrae
dc.subject.indexkeywordsTime Factors
dc.titleMagnetically controlled growing rod in early-onset scoliosis: A minimum of 2-year follow-up
dc.typeArticle
dcterms.referencesJ Pediatr Orthop, (2015), Odent, Thierry, Fusionless surgery in early-onset scoliosis, Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Surgery and Research, 101, 6, pp. S281-S288, (2015), Teoh, Kar H., Magnetic controlled growing rods for early-onset scoliosis: A 4-year follow-up, Spine Journal, 16, 4, pp. S34-S39, (2016), Bess, Shay R., Complications of growing-rod treatment for early-onset scoliosis: Analysis of one hundred and forty patients, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 92, 15, pp. 2533-2543, (2010), Sankar, Wudbhav N., Comparison of complications among growing spinal implants, Spine, 35, 23, pp. 2091-2096, (2010), Cheung, Kenneth Man Chee, Magnetically controlled growing rods for severe spinal curvature in young children: A prospective case series, The Lancet, 379, 9830, pp. 1967-1974, (2012), Dannawi, Zaher, Early results of a remotely-operated magnetic growth rod in early-onset scoliosis, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B, 95 B, 1, pp. 75-80, (2013), Akbarnia, Behrooz A., Next generation of growth-sparing techniques: Preliminary clinical results of a magnetically controlled growing rod in 14 patients with early-onset scoliosis, Spine, 38, 8, pp. 665-670, (2013), Hickey, Ben A., Early experience of MAGEC magnetic growing rods in the treatment of early onset scoliosis, European Spine Journal, 23, SUPPL. 1, pp. S61-S65, (2014), Teoh, Kar H., Do magnetic growing rods have lower complication rates compared with conventional growing rods?, Spine Journal, 16, 4, pp. S40-S44, (2016)
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.indexed.atScopus
person.identifier.scopus-author-id17637083900
person.identifier.scopus-author-id37037278400
person.identifier.scopus-author-id55972140700
person.identifier.scopus-author-id56910206300
person.identifier.scopus-author-id24177703400
person.identifier.scopus-author-id14830468600

Files