Publication:
Effect of polymer sulfonation on the proton conductivity and fuel cell performance of polyvinylalcohol-mordenite direct methanol fuel cell membranes

dc.contributor.authorUctug, Fehmi Gorkem
dc.contributor.authorNijem, Jinan
dc.contributor.institutionUctug, Fehmi Gorkem, Faculty of Engineering and Computer Sciences, Izmir Ekonomi Üniversitesi, Izmir, Turkey
dc.contributor.institutionNijem, Jinan, Department of Energy Systems Engineering, Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi, Istanbul, Turkey
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-05T16:15:29Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractSulfonated polyvinylalcohol-mordenite (SPVA-MOR) membranes for direct methanol fuel cell use were synthesized and characterized. It had earlier been found out that polyvinylalcohol-mordenite (PVA-MOR) membranes, while having excellent methanol permeability and modest proton conductivity values, had inferior direct methanol fuel cell performances than Nafion™. Sulfonating the polyvinylalcohol matrix had been suggested to improve the proton conductivity. In this work, polyvinylalcohol powder was sulfonated by using propane sultone as the sulfonating agent prior to the membrane synthesis. Morphological analyses revealed that the zeolite particles mixed homogeneously within the polymer matrix. Sulfonating the polymer slightly decreased both water and methanol uptakes. Both in PVA-MOR and SPVA-MOR membranes, water uptake turned out to be higher than the methanol uptake. SPVA-MOR membranes were found to have an average proton conductivity of 0.052 S·cm−1 when compared with the 0.036 S·cm−1 of PVA-MOR membranes, while Nafion™ has a proton conductivity of approximately 0.1 S·cm−1. The increase in the proton conductivity upon sulfonation despite the decrease in water uptake was explained by the dominance of the Grotthuss mechanism over the vehicular mechanism for proton conductivity. Fuel cell test results showed that while SPVA-MOR membranes cannot outperform Nafion™, they give higher power output than PVA-MOR membranes, especially at low temperatures and high methanol concentrations. © 2017 Curtin University of Technology and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. © 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/apj.2105
dc.identifier.endpage693
dc.identifier.issn19322135
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85020231980
dc.identifier.startpage682
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/apj.2105
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14719/11992
dc.identifier.volume12
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherJohn Wiley and Sons Ltd vgorayska@wiley.com Southern Gate Chichester, West Sussex PO19 8SQ
dc.relation.sourceAsia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering
dc.subject.authorkeywordsDirect Methanol Fuel Cells
dc.subject.authorkeywordsMordenite
dc.subject.authorkeywordsPolymer-zeolite Membranes
dc.subject.authorkeywordsPolyvinylalcohol
dc.subject.authorkeywordsProton Conductivity
dc.subject.authorkeywordsSulfonation
dc.subject.authorkeywordsFuel Cells
dc.subject.authorkeywordsMembranes
dc.subject.authorkeywordsMethanol
dc.subject.authorkeywordsMethanol Fuels
dc.subject.authorkeywordsPolyvinyl Alcohols
dc.subject.authorkeywordsProton Conductivity
dc.subject.authorkeywordsSulfonation
dc.subject.authorkeywordsZeolites
dc.subject.authorkeywordsDirect Methanol Fuel Cell Performance
dc.subject.authorkeywordsGrotthuss Mechanism
dc.subject.authorkeywordsMethanol Concentration
dc.subject.authorkeywordsMethanol Permeability
dc.subject.authorkeywordsMordenites
dc.subject.authorkeywordsMorphological Analysis
dc.subject.authorkeywordsProton Conductivity And Fuel Cells
dc.subject.authorkeywordsZeolite Membrane
dc.subject.authorkeywordsDirect Methanol Fuel Cells (dmfc)
dc.subject.indexkeywordsFuel cells
dc.subject.indexkeywordsMembranes
dc.subject.indexkeywordsMethanol
dc.subject.indexkeywordsMethanol fuels
dc.subject.indexkeywordsPolyvinyl alcohols
dc.subject.indexkeywordsProton conductivity
dc.subject.indexkeywordsSulfonation
dc.subject.indexkeywordsZeolites
dc.subject.indexkeywordsDirect methanol fuel cell performance
dc.subject.indexkeywordsGrotthuss mechanism
dc.subject.indexkeywordsMethanol concentration
dc.subject.indexkeywordsMethanol permeability
dc.subject.indexkeywordsMordenites
dc.subject.indexkeywordsMorphological analysis
dc.subject.indexkeywordsProton conductivity and fuel cells
dc.subject.indexkeywordsZeolite membrane
dc.subject.indexkeywordsDirect methanol fuel cells (DMFC)
dc.titleEffect of polymer sulfonation on the proton conductivity and fuel cell performance of polyvinylalcohol-mordenite direct methanol fuel cell membranes
dc.typeArticle
dcterms.referencesOutlook for Energy A View to 2040, (2016), BP Energy Outlook, (2016), Life Cycle Analyses of End User Electricity Generation in Ten Major European Countries Presented at the 39th Iaee International Conference Energy Expectations and Uncertainty, (2016), Thermal Effects in Supercapacitors, (2015), Fuel Cell Fundamentals, (2025), Ersöz, Atilla, A simulated auto-thermal membrane reformer process for a PEM fuel cell micro cogeneration unit, Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering, 4, 3, pp. 291-300, (2009), Garnica-Rodriguez, Jairo I., Silica nafion modified composite membranes for direct methanol fuel cells, Developments in Chemical Engineering and Mineral Processing, 14, 1-2, pp. 119-131, (2006), Energy Gov Office of Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Page, undefined, Baglio, Vincenzo, Composite anode electrode based on iridium oxide promoter for direct methanol fuel cells, Electrochimica Acta, 128, pp. 304-310, (2014)
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.indexed.atScopus
person.identifier.scopus-author-id55239883600
person.identifier.scopus-author-id57194441148

Files