Publication: Integrated AHP & TOPSIS methodology using intuitionistic Z-numbers: An application on hydrogen storage technology selection
| dc.contributor.author | Haktanır, Elif | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kahraman, Cengız | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Haktanır, Elif, Department of Industrial Engineering, Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi, Istanbul, Turkey | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Kahraman, Cengız, Department of Industrial Engineering, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Istanbul, Turkey | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-10-05T14:49:26Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The reliability of decision makers' judgments together with their degree of hesitancy are often ignored in decision models. The inclusion of judgments with only triangular belonging functions causes a great deal of information loss since non-belongingness functions are ignored in those decision models. In the literature, a method on how to integrate the intuitionistic reliability function into the decision maker's judgment has not been clearly proposed. To handle these issues, we aim at developing a novel intuitionistic Z-AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) & Z-TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solutions) methodology in this paper. Z-numbers can be used to express uncertain quantities with different degrees of precision, which can be very useful in practical applications. Our methodology considers both the restriction function and its reliability function under intuitionistic fuzziness based on α-cut approach and uses non-linear intuitionistic belonging and unbelonging functions. We compare our approach with interval-valued fuzzy TOPSIS and conduct a sensitivity analysis to assess the effects of changes in criteria weights on the rankings of the alternatives. Our results show that the proposed methodology can effectively evaluate and rank the existing alternatives, considering the uncertainties and complexities of the decision environment. This research provides valuable insights for decision-makers and can take part in their decision support systems. The proposed methodology has been applied to a hydrogen storage technology selection problem. According to the results, the most favorable hydrogen storage option in the considered case is chemical storage alternative followed by liquid storage, compressed storage, carbon nanostructure storage, and metal–organic framework storage alternatives. The inference of the comparative analysis with intuitionistic Z-AHP and interval-valued fuzzy TOPSIS method is that the best two alternatives are same in both methodologies whereas the third and the fifth alternatives are replaced since a different linearization approach is applied to the non-linear restriction function multiplied by the reliability function. © 2023 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122382 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 09574174 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85177786691 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122382 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14719/7262 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 239 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier Ltd | |
| dc.relation.source | Expert Systems with Applications | |
| dc.subject.authorkeywords | Ahp | |
| dc.subject.authorkeywords | Hydrogen Storage | |
| dc.subject.authorkeywords | Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets | |
| dc.subject.authorkeywords | Topsis | |
| dc.subject.authorkeywords | Z-numbers | |
| dc.subject.authorkeywords | Artificial Intelligence | |
| dc.subject.authorkeywords | Decision Making | |
| dc.subject.authorkeywords | Decision Support Systems | |
| dc.subject.authorkeywords | Fuzzy Sets | |
| dc.subject.authorkeywords | Hierarchical Systems | |
| dc.subject.authorkeywords | Reliability Analysis | |
| dc.subject.authorkeywords | Sensitivity Analysis | |
| dc.subject.authorkeywords | Ahp | |
| dc.subject.authorkeywords | Decision Makers | |
| dc.subject.authorkeywords | Decision Modeling | |
| dc.subject.authorkeywords | Hydrogen Storage Technologies | |
| dc.subject.authorkeywords | Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets | |
| dc.subject.authorkeywords | Non Linear | |
| dc.subject.authorkeywords | Reliability Functions | |
| dc.subject.authorkeywords | Technology Selection | |
| dc.subject.authorkeywords | Topsis | |
| dc.subject.authorkeywords | Z-number | |
| dc.subject.authorkeywords | Hydrogen Storage | |
| dc.subject.indexkeywords | Artificial intelligence | |
| dc.subject.indexkeywords | Decision making | |
| dc.subject.indexkeywords | Decision support systems | |
| dc.subject.indexkeywords | Fuzzy sets | |
| dc.subject.indexkeywords | Hierarchical systems | |
| dc.subject.indexkeywords | Reliability analysis | |
| dc.subject.indexkeywords | Sensitivity analysis | |
| dc.subject.indexkeywords | AHP | |
| dc.subject.indexkeywords | Decision makers | |
| dc.subject.indexkeywords | Decision modeling | |
| dc.subject.indexkeywords | Hydrogen storage technologies | |
| dc.subject.indexkeywords | Intuitionistic fuzzy sets | |
| dc.subject.indexkeywords | Non linear | |
| dc.subject.indexkeywords | Reliability functions | |
| dc.subject.indexkeywords | Technology selection | |
| dc.subject.indexkeywords | TOPSIS | |
| dc.subject.indexkeywords | Z-number | |
| dc.subject.indexkeywords | Hydrogen storage | |
| dc.title | Integrated AHP & TOPSIS methodology using intuitionistic Z-numbers: An application on hydrogen storage technology selection | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dcterms.references | Aboutorab, Hamed, ZBWM: The Z-number extension of Best Worst Method and its application for supplier development, Expert Systems with Applications, 107, pp. 115-125, (2018), Acar, Canan, A novel multicriteria sustainability investigation of energy storage systems, International Journal of Energy Research, 43, 12, pp. 6419-6441, (2019), Ahmad, Nazihah, Integrating fuzzy AHP and Z-TOPSIS for supplier selection in an automotive manufacturing company, AIP Conference Proceedings, 2138, (2019), Albawab, Mona, Sustainability Performance Index for Ranking Energy Storage Technologies using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model and Hybrid Computational Method, Journal of Energy Storage, 32, (2020), Alkan, Nurşah, Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process Using Spherical Z-Numbers: Supplier Selection Application, Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 504 LNNS, pp. 702-713, (2022), Almutairi, Khalid, Determination of optimal renewable energy growth strategies using SWOT analysis, hybrid MCDM methods, and game theory: A case study, International Journal of Energy Research, 46, 5, pp. 6766-6789, (2022), Ashtiani, Farid Zokaee, Extension of fuzzy TOPSIS method based on interval-valued fuzzy sets, Applied Soft Computing, 9, 2, pp. 457-461, (2009), Atanassov, Krassimir T., Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20, 1, pp. 87-96, (1986), Božanić, Darko I., LBWA - Z-MAIRCA model supporting decision making in the army, Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 3, 2, pp. 87-110, (2020), Chatterjee, Kajal, A multi-criteria decision making for renewable energy selection using Z-numbers in uncertain environment, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 24, 2, pp. 739-764, (2018) | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| local.indexed.at | Scopus | |
| person.identifier.scopus-author-id | 57208484331 | |
| person.identifier.scopus-author-id | 7003388495 |
