Publication:
The effect of bacterial colonization and maggot debridement treatment on wound healing in chronic venous leg ulcers

dc.contributor.authorSirekbasan, Serhat
dc.contributor.authorPolat, Erdal
dc.contributor.authorCangel, Ugur
dc.contributor.institutionSirekbasan, Serhat, Department of Medical Services and Techniques, Çankiri Karatekin Üniversitesi, Cankiri, Turkey
dc.contributor.institutionPolat, Erdal, Department of Medical Microbiology, İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey, Traditional and Complementary Medicine Practice and Research Center, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey
dc.contributor.institutionCangel, Ugur, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi, Istanbul, Turkey
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-05T15:39:32Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractBackground: The debridement of necrotic and infected tissues, which prolong the wound healing process, is important for the preparation of the wound bed. Therefore, wound-bed preparation and debridement are vital components of venous leg ulcer management. We aimed to present a perspective to evaluate the clinical and microbiological efficacy of Maggot Debridement Therapy (MDT) in the treatment of chronic leg ulcers caused by venous insufficiency. Methods: Thirty-eight patients with chronic venous leg ulcers who were referred to our unit with an MDT request were included in the study. Lucilia sericata larvae were applied to the wounds two days a week until the necrotic tissue was cleared. Swab samples were regularly taken before and immediately after each larval application for wound culture. Changes in the percentage of wound surface area and growing pathogenic microorganisms were recorded during the follow-up period. Results: The sample consisted of 38 patients with 55 venous leg ulcers. The mean initial ulcer surface area was 99.1 cm2 (range 3 - 500). Complete debridement was achieved in all ulcers in the 2nd week, on average. Twenty-five ulcers (45.5%) were completely debrided with two one-week MDT sessions. Complete wound healing occurred in 42 ulcers (76.4%) after an average of seven MDT sessions. Microorganisms isolated from the wounds significantly decreased immediately after the first MDT session. Conclusions: Although many methods are used in the treatment of venous leg ulcers, they are often not effective. MDT, which is coming into widespread use today, is a simple and effective method in the treatment of these ulcers. Its effects such as biodebridement, disinfection, and growth stimulation can encourage the rapid healing of chronic venous leg ulcers. © 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doi10.7754/Clin.Lab.2020.201137
dc.identifier.endpage1292
dc.identifier.issn14336510
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.pubmed33978359
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85105767252
dc.identifier.startpage1289
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.7754/Clin.Lab.2020.201137
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14719/10009
dc.identifier.volume67
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherVerlag Klinisches Labor GmbH
dc.relation.sourceClinical Laboratory
dc.subject.authorkeywordsMaggot Debridement Therapy
dc.subject.authorkeywordsMicroorganisms
dc.subject.authorkeywordsVenous Insufficiency
dc.subject.authorkeywordsVenous Leg Ulcers
dc.subject.authorkeywordsAcinetobacter
dc.subject.authorkeywordsAdult
dc.subject.authorkeywordsAged
dc.subject.authorkeywordsArticle
dc.subject.authorkeywordsBacterial Colonization
dc.subject.authorkeywordsChronic Disease
dc.subject.authorkeywordsClinical Article
dc.subject.authorkeywordsCoagulase Negative Staphylococcus
dc.subject.authorkeywordsCorynebacterium
dc.subject.authorkeywordsEnterobacter
dc.subject.authorkeywordsEscherichia Coli
dc.subject.authorkeywordsFemale
dc.subject.authorkeywordsFollow Up
dc.subject.authorkeywordsHuman
dc.subject.authorkeywordsKlebsiella
dc.subject.authorkeywordsLeg Ulcer
dc.subject.authorkeywordsLucilia Sericata
dc.subject.authorkeywordsMaggot Therapy
dc.subject.authorkeywordsMale
dc.subject.authorkeywordsProteus Mirabilis
dc.subject.authorkeywordsPseudomonas Aeruginosa
dc.subject.authorkeywordsRetrospective Study
dc.subject.authorkeywordsSerratia Marcescens
dc.subject.authorkeywordsStaphylococcus Aureus
dc.subject.authorkeywordsStenotrophomonas Maltophilia
dc.subject.authorkeywordsSurface Area
dc.subject.authorkeywordsTherapy Effect
dc.subject.authorkeywordsVein Insufficiency
dc.subject.authorkeywordsWound Healing
dc.subject.authorkeywordsAnimal
dc.subject.authorkeywordsDebridement
dc.subject.authorkeywordsLarva
dc.subject.authorkeywordsNecrosis
dc.subject.authorkeywordsAnimals
dc.subject.authorkeywordsDebridement
dc.subject.authorkeywordsHumans
dc.subject.authorkeywordsLarva
dc.subject.authorkeywordsLeg Ulcer
dc.subject.authorkeywordsNecrosis
dc.subject.authorkeywordsWound Healing
dc.subject.indexkeywordsAcinetobacter
dc.subject.indexkeywordsadult
dc.subject.indexkeywordsaged
dc.subject.indexkeywordsArticle
dc.subject.indexkeywordsbacterial colonization
dc.subject.indexkeywordschronic disease
dc.subject.indexkeywordsclinical article
dc.subject.indexkeywordscoagulase negative Staphylococcus
dc.subject.indexkeywordsCorynebacterium
dc.subject.indexkeywordsEnterobacter
dc.subject.indexkeywordsEscherichia coli
dc.subject.indexkeywordsfemale
dc.subject.indexkeywordsfollow up
dc.subject.indexkeywordshuman
dc.subject.indexkeywordsKlebsiella
dc.subject.indexkeywordsleg ulcer
dc.subject.indexkeywordsLucilia sericata
dc.subject.indexkeywordsmaggot therapy
dc.subject.indexkeywordsmale
dc.subject.indexkeywordsProteus mirabilis
dc.subject.indexkeywordsPseudomonas aeruginosa
dc.subject.indexkeywordsretrospective study
dc.subject.indexkeywordsSerratia marcescens
dc.subject.indexkeywordsStaphylococcus aureus
dc.subject.indexkeywordsStenotrophomonas maltophilia
dc.subject.indexkeywordssurface area
dc.subject.indexkeywordstherapy effect
dc.subject.indexkeywordsvein insufficiency
dc.subject.indexkeywordswound healing
dc.subject.indexkeywordsanimal
dc.subject.indexkeywordsdebridement
dc.subject.indexkeywordslarva
dc.subject.indexkeywordsnecrosis
dc.subject.indexkeywordsAnimals
dc.subject.indexkeywordsDebridement
dc.subject.indexkeywordsHumans
dc.subject.indexkeywordsLarva
dc.subject.indexkeywordsLeg Ulcer
dc.subject.indexkeywordsNecrosis
dc.subject.indexkeywordsWound Healing
dc.titleThe effect of bacterial colonization and maggot debridement treatment on wound healing in chronic venous leg ulcers
dc.typeArticle
dcterms.referencesAdv Skin Wound Care, (2003), Indian Dermatol Online J, (2014), McCaughan, Dorothy, Patients' perceptions and experiences of venous leg ulceration and their attitudes to larval therapy: An in-depth qualitative study, Health Expectations, 18, 4, pp. 527-541, (2015), Neumann, H. A.Martino, Evidence-based (S3) guidelines for diagnostics and treatment of venous leg ulcers, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 30, 11, pp. 1843-1875, (2016), Sdu Salk Bilimleri Dergisi, (2019), Parnés, A., Larval therapy in wound management: A review, International Journal of Clinical Practice, 61, 3, pp. 488-493, (2007), Robinson, William D., Destruction of pyogenic bacteria in the alimentary tract of surgical maggots implanted in infected wounds, Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine, 19, 6, pp. 581-586, (1934), Sherman, Ronald A., Maggot therapy for treating diabetic foot ulcers unresponsive to conventional therapy, Diabetes Care, 26, 2, pp. 446-451, (2003), Bazaliński, Dariusz, Effectiveness of chronic wound debridement with the use of larvae of lucilia sericata, Journal of Clinical Medicine, 8, 11, (2019), Adv Skin Wound Care, (2007)
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.indexed.atScopus
person.identifier.scopus-author-id55342894700
person.identifier.scopus-author-id6602452499
person.identifier.scopus-author-id6507844076

Files