Publication:
Vision 2023: Feasibility analysis of Turkey's renewable energy projection

dc.contributor.authorMelikoǧlu, Mehmet
dc.contributor.institutionMelikoǧlu, Mehmet, Department of Energy Systems Engineering, Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi, Istanbul, Turkey
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-05T16:40:37Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.description.abstractElectricity consumption of Turkey at the year 2023 is estimated to be around 530,000 GWh. Turkey plans to supply 30% or 160,000 GWh of this demand from renewable energy sources according to the recently avowed government agenda Vision 2023. However, the current installed renewable energy capacity is around 60,000 GWh. Detailed literature analysis showed that only wind and solar energy potential in Turkey can solely supply this demand. In this study, two different scenarios were generated to analyse the cost and environmental impacts of supplying this demand. Scenario 1, which is derived from the official Vision 2023 targets, suggests supplying this demand from wind, solar, geothermal energy and hydropower. The total projected cost based on Scenario 1 is estimated to be $31.000 billion and annual greenhouse gas emissions of 1.05 million tonnes of CO <inf>2</inf> equivalent. According to Scenario 2 or the contrary setup it is assumed that the required demand gap could not be supplied from new renewable energy investments but equally from coal and natural gas. The projected cost is estimated to be around $8.000 billion and annual greenhouse gas emissions at appalling 71.30 million tonnes of CO <inf>2</inf> equivalent. Assuming carbon tax at the year 2023 to be $50 per tonne of CO <inf>2</inf> emitted, supplying the demand from renewable energy sources according to Scenario 1 would generate savings worth nearly $2.175 billion from environmental taxes annually. Thus, making the payback time of the renewable energy investments less than 15 years. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. © 2012 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.renene.2012.07.032
dc.identifier.endpage575
dc.identifier.isbn9780123750259
dc.identifier.issn18790682
dc.identifier.issn09601481
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84865281491
dc.identifier.startpage570
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.07.032
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14719/13235
dc.identifier.volume50
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.sourceRenewable Energy
dc.subject.authorkeywordsCarbon Tax
dc.subject.authorkeywordsEnergy Consumption
dc.subject.authorkeywordsRenewable Energy
dc.subject.authorkeywordsSustainability
dc.subject.authorkeywordsTurkish Energy Policy
dc.subject.authorkeywordsCarbon Taxes
dc.subject.authorkeywordsElectricity-consumption
dc.subject.authorkeywordsEnvironmental Taxes
dc.subject.authorkeywordsFeasibility Analysis
dc.subject.authorkeywordsLiterature Analysis
dc.subject.authorkeywordsPayback Time
dc.subject.authorkeywordsRenewable Energies
dc.subject.authorkeywordsRenewable Energy Capacity
dc.subject.authorkeywordsRenewable Energy Source
dc.subject.authorkeywordsTurkishs
dc.subject.authorkeywordsCarbon Dioxide
dc.subject.authorkeywordsEnergy Policy
dc.subject.authorkeywordsEnergy Utilization
dc.subject.authorkeywordsGas Emissions
dc.subject.authorkeywordsGeothermal Energy
dc.subject.authorkeywordsGreenhouse Gases
dc.subject.authorkeywordsInvestments
dc.subject.authorkeywordsNatural Resources
dc.subject.authorkeywordsSolar Energy
dc.subject.authorkeywordsSustainable Development
dc.subject.authorkeywordsCost Estimating
dc.subject.authorkeywordsCoal
dc.subject.authorkeywordsCost-benefit Analysis
dc.subject.authorkeywordsDemand-side Management
dc.subject.authorkeywordsEmission Inventory
dc.subject.authorkeywordsEnergy Planning
dc.subject.authorkeywordsEnergy Policy
dc.subject.authorkeywordsEnergy Use
dc.subject.authorkeywordsEnvironmental Impact Assessment
dc.subject.authorkeywordsFeasibility Study
dc.subject.authorkeywordsGeothermal Energy
dc.subject.authorkeywordsGreenhouse Gas
dc.subject.authorkeywordsHydroelectric Power
dc.subject.authorkeywordsLiterature Review
dc.subject.authorkeywordsNatural Gas
dc.subject.authorkeywordsPollution Tax
dc.subject.authorkeywordsRenewable Resource
dc.subject.authorkeywordsSolar Power
dc.subject.authorkeywordsState Role
dc.subject.authorkeywordsSustainable Development
dc.subject.authorkeywordsWind Power
dc.subject.authorkeywordsTurkey
dc.subject.indexkeywordsCarbon taxes
dc.subject.indexkeywordsElectricity-consumption
dc.subject.indexkeywordsEnvironmental taxes
dc.subject.indexkeywordsFeasibility analysis
dc.subject.indexkeywordsLiterature analysis
dc.subject.indexkeywordsPayback time
dc.subject.indexkeywordsRenewable energies
dc.subject.indexkeywordsRenewable energy capacity
dc.subject.indexkeywordsRenewable energy source
dc.subject.indexkeywordsTurkishs
dc.subject.indexkeywordsCarbon dioxide
dc.subject.indexkeywordsEnergy policy
dc.subject.indexkeywordsEnergy utilization
dc.subject.indexkeywordsGas emissions
dc.subject.indexkeywordsGeothermal energy
dc.subject.indexkeywordsGreenhouse gases
dc.subject.indexkeywordsInvestments
dc.subject.indexkeywordsNatural resources
dc.subject.indexkeywordsSolar energy
dc.subject.indexkeywordsSustainable development
dc.subject.indexkeywordsCost estimating
dc.subject.indexkeywordscoal
dc.subject.indexkeywordscost-benefit analysis
dc.subject.indexkeywordsdemand-side management
dc.subject.indexkeywordsemission inventory
dc.subject.indexkeywordsenergy planning
dc.subject.indexkeywordsenergy policy
dc.subject.indexkeywordsenergy use
dc.subject.indexkeywordsenvironmental impact assessment
dc.subject.indexkeywordsfeasibility study
dc.subject.indexkeywordsgeothermal energy
dc.subject.indexkeywordsgreenhouse gas
dc.subject.indexkeywordshydroelectric power
dc.subject.indexkeywordsliterature review
dc.subject.indexkeywordsnatural gas
dc.subject.indexkeywordspollution tax
dc.subject.indexkeywordsrenewable resource
dc.subject.indexkeywordssolar power
dc.subject.indexkeywordsstate role
dc.subject.indexkeywordssustainable development
dc.subject.indexkeywordswind power
dc.subject.indexkeywordsTurkey
dc.titleVision 2023: Feasibility analysis of Turkey's renewable energy projection
dc.typeArticle
dcterms.referencesWorld Factbook, Statistical Review of World Energy 2010, (2011), Ak Party S 2023 Vision, (2011), Yüksel, Ibrahim, Energy production and sustainable energy policies in Turkey, Renewable Energy, 35, 7, pp. 1469-1476, (2010), Sayin, Cengiz, Assessing of energy policies based on Turkish agriculture: Current status and some implications, Energy Policy, 33, 18, pp. 2361-2373, (2005), Ceylan, Halim, Estimating energy demand of Turkey based on economic indicators using genetic algorithm approach, Energy Conversion and Management, 45, 15-16, pp. 2525-2537, (2004), Heinberg, Richard, The end of cheap coal, Nature, 468, 7322, pp. 367-369, (2010), Bassi, Andrea Marcello, An integrated approach to energy prospects for North America and the rest of the world, Energy Economics, 32, 1, pp. 30-42, (2010), Turkey S Energy Strategy, (2013), Eu S Target for Renewable Energy 20 by 2020, (2008)
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.indexed.atScopus
person.identifier.scopus-author-id55342412100

Files