Publication:
The pandemic shock doctrine in an authoritarian context: the economic, bodily, and political precarity of Turkey’s journalists during the pandemic

dc.contributor.authorBulut, Ergin
dc.contributor.authorErtuna, Can
dc.contributor.institutionBulut, Ergin, College of Social Sciences and Humanities, Koç Üniversitesi, Istanbul, Turkey
dc.contributor.institutionErtuna, Can, Faculty of Communication, Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi, Istanbul, Turkey
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-05T15:16:50Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractWhat happens to journalists when hit by a pandemic in a country governed by authoritarian media regulations? We examine journalists’ experience in Turkey’s mainstream and alternative media and find that while the pandemic has deepened their economic precarity, journalists further suffer from bodily and political precarity. In the context of Covid, the body emerges as a site on which precarity with multiple dimensions (economic anxiety, illness, and state violence) is inscribed. Under the conditions of what we deem political precarity, most journalists cannot speak truth to power as the pandemic is politically instrumentalized. This retheorizing of precarity dewesternizes the term by connecting it to state-induced forms of violence relying on relations of political recognition and value ascription. We urge journalism and media labor studies to refrain from Eurocentricism and technological determinism that center the standard employment model and the disruptive cultures of technology at the expense of body and politics. © 2022 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/01634437221084108
dc.identifier.endpage1020
dc.identifier.issn14603675
dc.identifier.issn01634437
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85129142442
dc.identifier.startpage1003
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/01634437221084108
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14719/8727
dc.identifier.volume44
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSAGE Publications Ltd
dc.relation.sourceMedia, Culture and Society
dc.subject.authorkeywordsAuthoritarianism
dc.subject.authorkeywordsCovid-19
dc.subject.authorkeywordsDewesternizing
dc.subject.authorkeywordsGlobal Media
dc.subject.authorkeywordsJournalism
dc.subject.authorkeywordsLabor
dc.subject.authorkeywordsPrecarity
dc.subject.authorkeywordsTurkey
dc.titleThe pandemic shock doctrine in an authoritarian context: the economic, bodily, and political precarity of Turkey’s journalists during the pandemic
dc.typeArticle
dcterms.referencesTurkiye De Medya Endustrisi Neoliberalizm Cainda Mulkiyet Ve Kontrol Iliskileri, (2006), State of Exception, (2005), Alačovska, Ana, De-westernizing creative labour studies: The informality of creative work from an ex-centric perspective, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 22, 2, pp. 195-212, (2019), Alačovska, Ana, The work of hope: Spiritualizing, hustling and waiting in the creative industries in Ghana, Environment and Planning A, 53, 4, pp. 619-637, (2021), Badran, Yazan, Anatomy of a precarious newsroom: precarity and agency in Syrian exiled journalism in Turkey, Media, Culture and Society, 43, 8, pp. 1377-1394, (2021), Cruel Optimism, (2011), Betti, Eloisa, Historicizing precarious work: Forty years of research in the social sciences and humanities, International Review of Social History, 63, 2, pp. 273-319, (2018), Ba Medya Gozlem 2020 Bu Medya Ozgurluune Azmz Ack Kald, (2021), Pandemi Neoliberalizm Medya, (2021), New Left Review, (2013)
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.indexed.atScopus
person.identifier.scopus-author-id36863329900
person.identifier.scopus-author-id57224727639

Files