Publication:
The effects of exploration strategies and communication models on the performance of cooperative exploration

dc.contributor.authorTuna, Gürkan
dc.contributor.authorGülez, Kayhan
dc.contributor.authorGüngör, Vehbi Çağrı
dc.contributor.institutionTuna, Gürkan, Department of Computer Programming, Trakya Üniversitesi, Edirne, Turkey
dc.contributor.institutionGülez, Kayhan, Department of Control and Automation Engineering, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, Istanbul, Turkey
dc.contributor.institutionGüngör, Vehbi Çağrı, Department of Computer Engineering, Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi, Istanbul, Turkey
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-05T16:39:39Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.description.abstractExploration with mobile robots is utilized in a wide range of applications including search and rescue missions, planetary exploration, homeland security, surveillance, and reconnaissance. Cooperative exploration offers the potential of exploring an unknown zone more quickly and robustly than single-robot case. However, coordinating multiple robots is a challenging task due to heterogeneous processing and communication requirements, and the complexities of exploration algorithms. This paper presents a comparison of different cooperative exploration strategies, such as frontier-based exploration, market-driven exploration, and role-based exploration, based on their exploration performances and processing time requirements. To show the effect of CPU power on the processing time of the exploration algorithms, two notebooks and a netbook with different specifications have been extensively used. Comparative simulation results of our own application developed in Java show that the processing time requirements are consistent with the computational complexities of the exploration strategies. The results we obtained are consistent with the CPU power tests of independent organizations, and show that higher processing power reduces processing time accordingly. © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. © 2013 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.adhoc.2012.07.011
dc.identifier.endpage1941
dc.identifier.issn15708713
dc.identifier.issn15708705
dc.identifier.issue7
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84883461098
dc.identifier.startpage1931
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2012.07.011
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14719/13171
dc.identifier.volume11
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.sourceAd Hoc Networks
dc.subject.authorkeywordsCommunication Models
dc.subject.authorkeywordsCooperative Exploration Strategies
dc.subject.authorkeywordsExploration Performances
dc.subject.authorkeywordsNetbeans Ide
dc.subject.authorkeywordsProcessing Time Requirements
dc.subject.authorkeywordsCommunication Models
dc.subject.authorkeywordsComparative Simulation
dc.subject.authorkeywordsCooperative Exploration
dc.subject.authorkeywordsExploration Strategies
dc.subject.authorkeywordsFrontier-based Exploration
dc.subject.authorkeywordsHeterogeneous Processing
dc.subject.authorkeywordsNetbeans
dc.subject.authorkeywordsProcessing Time
dc.subject.authorkeywordsAlgorithms
dc.subject.authorkeywordsCommunication
dc.subject.authorkeywordsInformation Theory
dc.subject.authorkeywordsInterplanetary Spacecraft
dc.subject.authorkeywordsJava Programming Language
dc.subject.authorkeywordsCooperative Communication
dc.subject.indexkeywordsCommunication models
dc.subject.indexkeywordsComparative simulation
dc.subject.indexkeywordsCooperative exploration
dc.subject.indexkeywordsExploration strategies
dc.subject.indexkeywordsFrontier-based exploration
dc.subject.indexkeywordsHeterogeneous processing
dc.subject.indexkeywordsNetBeans
dc.subject.indexkeywordsProcessing time
dc.subject.indexkeywordsAlgorithms
dc.subject.indexkeywordsCommunication
dc.subject.indexkeywordsInformation theory
dc.subject.indexkeywordsInterplanetary spacecraft
dc.subject.indexkeywordsJava programming language
dc.subject.indexkeywordsCooperative communication
dc.titleThe effects of exploration strategies and communication models on the performance of cooperative exploration
dc.typeArticle
dcterms.referencesDissanayake, Gamini M.W.M., A solution to the simultaneous localization and map building (SLAM) problem, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 17, 3, pp. 229-241, (2001), Fenwick, John W., Cooperative concurrent mapping and localization, Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2, pp. 1810-1817, (2002), Williams, Stefan B., Towards multi-vehicle simultaneous localisation and mapping, Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 3, pp. 2743-2748, (2002), Tao, Tong, Multi-robot cooperative map building in unknown environment considering estimation uncertainty, pp. 2896-2901, (2008), Efficient Solutions to Autonomous Mapping and Navigation Problems, (2001), Rodríguez-Losada, Diego, Local maps fusion for real time multirobot indoor simultaneous localization and mapping, Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004, 2, pp. 1308-1313, (2004), undefined, Trevai, Chomchana, Multiple Mobile Robot Exploration and Patrol Strategy Using a Self-Organizing Planner Based on a Reaction-Diffusion Equation on a Graph, Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics, 20, 1, pp. 24-37, (2008), Arkin, Ronald Craig, Line-of-sight constrained exploration for reactive multiagent robotic teams, International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control, AMC, pp. 455-461, (2002), Artificial Intelligence A New Synthesis, (1998)
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.indexed.atScopus
person.identifier.scopus-author-id48862103700
person.identifier.scopus-author-id6602534829
person.identifier.scopus-author-id10739803300

Files