İstanbul içme suyu havzalarında uygulanan kamulaştırma çalışmalarının idare ekonomisi açısından incelenmesi
No Thumbnail Available
Files
Date
2014-01
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü
Abstract
İçme suyu insanlar için en önemli ihtiyaç maddelerinden biri olmasına rağmen içilebilir
su kaynaklarının sorumsuzca kirletilmesi, geri dönüşü olanaksız sorunların yaşanmasına
sebep olmakta ve kaynakların sürdürülebilirliğini günbegün tehlikeye sokmaktadır. Su
kaynaklarının kirlenmesindeki başlıca etkenler endüstriyel çalışmalar, tarımsal amaçlı
kullanım, nüfustaki yoğun artış vb olarak sıralanmaktadır. Yaşamsal faaliyetlerin
sürdürülebilmesi için devletin insanlar için yeterli miktarda ve kullanıma uygun içme
suyunu temin etmesi gerekmektedir.
İstanbul’da bulunan İçme suyu havza alanlarını kirlenmeye karşı korumak adına
havzaların mutlak koruma alanında uygulanmakta olan kamulaştırma çalışmaları,
yüksek maliyet gerektiren uygulamalardır. Taşınmaz iyesini mağdur etmeksizin en az
maliyetle uygulanabilecek kamulaştırma yönteminin saptanması amacıyla yapılan
çalışmada, İdarenin 2942 Sayılı Kanun hükümlerine göre uzlaşma yoluyla, bedel tespit
ve tescil davaları yoluyla ve kamulaştırmasız el atma davaları yoluyla yapılan
kamulaştırmalarla ilgili toplanan verilerle karşılaştırmalı analiz yapılmıştır. Taşınmazın
zemin ve varsa muhdesat bedeli dışında hiçbir bedel ödenmeden yapılan uzlaşma yolu
ile yapılan kamulaştırmada, İdarenin belirlediği m² birim bedelin mahkeme fiyatlarının
altında kalması sebebiyle tercih edilmediği bu sebeple İdarenin, aleyhine açılan
kamulaştırmasız el atma davalarına maruz kaldığı tespit edilmiştir. Ödenen ağır
tazminat bedellerine tedbir amacıyla açılan bedel tespit ve tescil davaları hız kazanmış,
bu sayede mahkeme vekalet ücretleri maktu hale gelerek, icra ve faiz ödemeleri bertaraf
edilmiştir.
Although potable water is one of the most important necessaries for the human beings, being polluted potable water resources irresponsibly causes the point of no return and endangers sustainability of the resources gradually. The major factors in the pollution of the water resources are specified as the industry works, agricultural usages, and overpopulation and so on. The government should provide to supply domestic water sufficiently for maintaining of the vital activity for the people. Expropriation works being implemented in the strict protected areas of the water basins in order to preserve the potable water basin areas against for pollution in İstanbul, are high cost implementations. In the work that is made with intent to determination the method of the expropriation that will be implement with the less cost without aggrieving the owner of a real estate, Comparative analysis was conducted with the datas collected about expropriations with the case of confiscating without expropriating, registration, price determination, and negotiation according to law numbered 2942 of the administration. Because m² unit price, which the Administration determines, is under price which the court determines, it is not preferable in the expropriation that is made with the method of the negotiation without payment except of the true value of the land. Therefore, It is identified that administration is exposed to cases of the confiscating without expropriating to against the administration. Registration and price determination cases that are sued with the intent of precaution of the heavy amount of compensation paying have accelerated. And thanks for this situation, enforcement and interest payments have been removed court as fixed retainers.
Although potable water is one of the most important necessaries for the human beings, being polluted potable water resources irresponsibly causes the point of no return and endangers sustainability of the resources gradually. The major factors in the pollution of the water resources are specified as the industry works, agricultural usages, and overpopulation and so on. The government should provide to supply domestic water sufficiently for maintaining of the vital activity for the people. Expropriation works being implemented in the strict protected areas of the water basins in order to preserve the potable water basin areas against for pollution in İstanbul, are high cost implementations. In the work that is made with intent to determination the method of the expropriation that will be implement with the less cost without aggrieving the owner of a real estate, Comparative analysis was conducted with the datas collected about expropriations with the case of confiscating without expropriating, registration, price determination, and negotiation according to law numbered 2942 of the administration. Because m² unit price, which the Administration determines, is under price which the court determines, it is not preferable in the expropriation that is made with the method of the negotiation without payment except of the true value of the land. Therefore, It is identified that administration is exposed to cases of the confiscating without expropriating to against the administration. Registration and price determination cases that are sued with the intent of precaution of the heavy amount of compensation paying have accelerated. And thanks for this situation, enforcement and interest payments have been removed court as fixed retainers.
Description
Keywords
Expropriation, Strict protected area, Basin, Kamulaştırma, Mutlak koruma, Havza