Publication:
Disiplinlerarası yeni üniversite ve Türkiye'de fen edebiyat fakülteleri için bir yapılanma önerisi

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorHasan ŞİMŞEK
dc.contributor.authorÖzge HACIFAZILOĞLU
dc.contributor.institutionBAHÇEŞEHİR ÜNİVERSİTESİ
dc.contributor.institutionBAHÇEŞEHİR ÜNİVERSİTESİ
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-20T20:03:57Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.date.submitted29.07.2022
dc.description.abstractYeni üniversite anlayışı özellikle lisans düzeyinde disipliner derinliği azaltarak öğrencilere kendini geliştirme olanakları veren disiplinler arası bir anlayışı ön plana çıkarmaktadır. Öğrencinin birey olarak çok yönlü bir eğitimden geçmesi onların ileride toplumda üstlenecekleri rol ve bireysel gelişimleri açısından önemli görülmektedir. Yaratıcı düşünebilen, karar verme becerilerine sahip, sorunlara eleştirel ve çok yönlü bakabilen, duygu ve düşüncelerini iyi ve etkili ifade edebilen, anadilini etkili kullanabilen, en az bir yabancı dili temel düzeyde yazılı ve sözlü olarak kullanabilen birey tanımı böylesi bir program anlayışının temel gerekçelerinden biridir. Bu çalışmada üniversite kavramındaki gelişmeler ve yenilikler de temel alınarak, Türkiye'de Fen Edebiyat Fakülteleri'nin yeniden yapılandırılması konusunda bir öneri tartışılacaktır. Ülkemizde Fen ve Edebiyat Fakültesi mezunlarının yaygınlıkla yaşadıkları işsizlik sorunu üniversite düzeyinde onlara ikinci bir alanın temel bilgi ve becerilerini kazandırmak yoluyla en aza indirebilir. Gelişmiş ülkelerde üniversitelerin birçoğunda, Fen Edebiyat Fakülteleri öğrencilerinin ilk yıl ortak dersleri aldıkları, ilerleyen yıllarda ise danışmanlarıyla işbirliği içinde öğrencilerin kendi ders planlarını hazırladıkları görülmektedir. Bu yapıda program hazırlanırken, öğrencinin bireysel ilgi ve ihtiyaçları, mezuniyetten sonra iş bulmalarını kolaylaştırması, toplumun ve mesleğinin gerektirdiği temel bilgi ve becerileri kapsayacak şekilde düzenlenmesi göz önünde bulundurulmalıdır.
dc.identifier.endpage749
dc.identifier.issn1303-0485
dc.identifier.issn2148-7561
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.startpage731
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14719/5928
dc.identifier.volume12
dc.language.isotr
dc.relation.journalKuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri
dc.subjectEğitim
dc.subjectEğitim Araştırmaları
dc.titleDisiplinlerarası yeni üniversite ve Türkiye'de fen edebiyat fakülteleri için bir yapılanma önerisi
dc.typeReview
dcterms.referencesAbbott, A. (2001). The chaos of disciplines. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.,American Association of Universities. (2005). Report of the in-terdisciplinarity task force. Washington,,DC. www.aau.edu/WorkArea/showcontent.aspx?id=462 adresinden 3.09.2008 tarihinde edinilmiştir.,Arizona State University (ASU). (2009). Women and gender studies. Bachelor of Arts Program Description. http://newcol-lege.asu.edu/harcs/degrees/majors/womenstudies adresinden 3.10.2010 tarihinde edinilmiştir.,ASHE (2009). ASHE Higher Education Report. ASHE Higher Education Report Series, 35 (2). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.,Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Bristol, PA: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.,Becher, T. (1994). The significance of disciplinary differences. Studies in Higher Education, 19 (2), 151-161.,Biglan, A. (1973). Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57 (3), 204 - 213.,Boix Mansilla, M. V. (2008). Integrative learning: Setting the stage for pedagogy of the contemporary. Peer Review, 10 (4), 31.,Boix Mansilla, M. V., & Duraising, E. D. (2007). Targeted as-sesssment of students' interdisciplinary work: An empirically grounded framework proposed. The Journal of Higher Education, 78 (2), 215-237.,Boix Mansilla, M. V., Miller, W. C., & Gardner, H. (2000). On disciplinary lenses and interdisciplinary work. In S. Wineburg, & P. Gorsman (Eds.), Interdisciplinary curriculum: Challenges of implementation (pp. 17-38). New York: Teachers College Press.,Bok, D. (2006). Our underachieving colleges: A candid look at how much students learn and why they should be learning more. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.,Braxton, J. M., & Hargens, L. L. (1996). Variation among academic disciplines: Analytical frameworks and research. In J. C. Smart (Ed.). Higher education: Handbook of theory and practice (pp. 1-46). New York: Agathon Press.,Brint, S., & Cantwell, A. M. (2011). Academic disciplines and the undergraduate experience: Rethinking Bok's underachieving colleges thesis. Center for Studies in Higher Education. Research and Occasional Paper Series, 6(11).,Brint, S., Turk, B. L., Proctor, K., & Murphy, S. (2009a). Expanding the social frame of knowledge: Interdisciplinary, degree granting fields in American four year colleges and universities, 1975-2000. Review of Higher Education, 32 (2), 155-183.,Brint, S., Turk, B. L., Proctor, K., Murphy, S., & Hanneman, R. (2009b). The market model and the growth and decline of academic fileds in US colleges and universities, 1975-2000. http:// www.higher-ed2000.ucr.edu./Publications/Brint%20et%20 al%20(2009a)pdfnewcollege.asu.edu/harcs/degrees/majors/ womenstudies adresinden 3.09.2009 tarihinde edinilmiştir.,Campbell, L. M. (2005). Overcoming obstacles to interdisciplinary research. Conservation Biology, 19, 574-577.,Cashin, W. E. (1990) Students do rate different academic fields differently. In M. Theall 8c J. Franklin (Eds.), Student ratings of instruction: Issues for improving practice (pp. 113-121). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.,Clark, B. (1987). The academic life: Small worlds, different worlds. Princeton: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching,Clark, B. (1996). Substantive growth and innovative organization: New categories for higher education research. Higher Education, 32 (4), 417-430.,Clark, B. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Oxford: Pergamon-Elsevier.,Clark, B. (2004). Sustaining change in universities: Continuities in case studies and concepts. New York: Open University Press.,Crow, M. M. (2010) .Toward institutional innovation in America's colleges and universities. Trustteeship, May, 1-5. Retrieved 3 September, 2011 from http://newamericanuniversity.asu.edu/docs/ Trusteeship_Magazine_Toward_Institutional_Innovation.pdf,Davis, J. (1995). Interdisciplinary courses and team teaching: New arrangemenets for learning. Washington: American Council on Education, Oryx Press.,Donald, J. (2002). Learning to think: Disciplinary perspectives. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.,Eckel, P., & Kezar, A. (2003). Taking the reins: Institutional transformation in higher education. Westport, CT: Praeger Pub.,Edgerton, R„ Hutchings, P., & Quinlan, K. (1991). The teaching portfolio: Capturing the scholarship in Teaching. Washington D. C: American Association for Higher Education.,Eisen, A., Hall, A., Soon, L. T., & Zupko, J. (2009). Teaching water: Connecting across disciplines and into daily life to address complex societal issues. College Teaching, 57 (2), 99-104.,Ek Yerleştirme Haberler. (2010). Önce gir sonra bölümünü seç. http://www.ekyerlestirme.com/haberler-ve-duyurular/772-once-gir-sonra-bolum-sec.html adresinden 8.11.2010 tarihinde edinilmiştir.,Feller, I. (2002). New organizations, old cultures: Strategy and implementation of interdisciplinary programs. Research Evaluation, 11,109-116.,Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Dekanlar Toplantısı. (2006). Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Dekanları toplantısı sonuç raporu. http://fef. kocaeli.edu.tr/dekanlik/krel.doc adresinden 12.03.2011 tarihinde edinilmiştir.,Franklin, J., & Theall, M. (1995) The relationship of disciplinary differences and the value of class preparation time to student ratings of teaching. In N. Hativa & M. Marincovich (Eds), Disciplinary differences in teaching and learning: Implications for practice (pp. 41-48). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.,Gumport, P.,& Snydman, S. (2002). The formal organization of knowledge: An analysis of academic structure. Journal of Higher Education, 73 (3), 375-408.,Gür, T. M. (2003). Araştırma ve eğitimde disiplinlerarasılık. O. N. Babüroğlu (Ed.), Eğitimin geleceği. Üniversitelerin ve eğitimin değişen paradigması içinde (s. 181-211). Sabancı Üniversitesi: İstanbul.,Gürsoy, S. (2009). YÖK'ten bölümsüz üniversitelere uyarı. Sabah Gazetesi, 29 Nisan. 2009. http://www.sabah.com.tr/Yazarlar/ gursoy/2009/04/29/YoK_ten_bolumsuz_universitelere_uyari adresinden 7.12.2010 tarihinde edinilmiştir.,Harris, M. & Holley, K. (2008). Constructing the interdisciplinary ivory tower: The planning of interdisciplinary spaces on university campuses. Planning for Higher Education, 36(3), 34-43.,Hativa, N., & Marincovich, M. (Eds.). (1995). Disciplinary differences in teaching and learning: Implications for practice. New directions for teaching and learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.,Haworth, J. G., & Conrad, C. E. (1997). Emblems of quality in higher education: Developing and sustaining high quality programs. Boston: Ally and Bacon.,Helfand, D. J. (2010). What are the benefits of interdisciplinary education? Erudito, February. Retrieved 5 October, 2011 from http://eruditojournal.org/?page_id=163.,Holley, K. (2009a). Interdisciplinary strategies as tranformative change in higher education. Innovative Higher Education, 34,331-344.,Holley, K. (2009b). Understanding interdisciplinary challenges and opportunities in higher education. ASHE Higher Education Report Series, 35 (2). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.,Huber, M. (2006). Disciplines, pedagogy, and inquiry based learning about teaching. In C. Kreber (Ed.), Exploring research based teaching (pp. 69-77). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.,Ivanitskaya, L., Clark, D„ Montgomery, G., & Primeau, R. (2002). Interdisciplinary learning: Process and outcomes. Innovative Higher Education, 27 (2), 95-111.,Jacobsen, C. H., Hels, T., & McLaughlin, W. J. (2004). Barriers and facilitators to integration among scientists in transdiscip-linary landscape analyses: A cross country comparison. Forest Policy and Economics, 6,15-30.,Klein, J. T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, and practice. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.,Klein, J. T. (2005). The discourse on transdisciplinarity: An expanding global field. In J. T. Klein, W. Gorssenbacher-Mansuy, R. Haberli, A. Bill, R. W. Scholz, & M. Welti (Eds.), Transdisciplinarity: Joint problem solving among science, technology, and society-an effective way for managing complexity (pp. 35-44). Basel, Switzerland: Birkhause Verlag.,Kogan, M. (2000,). Transforming higher education: A comparative study. London: Kingsley.,Krometis, L. H., Clark, E. P., Gonzalez, V., & Leslie, M. E. (2011). The 'death' of disciplines: Development of a team-ta-ught course to provide an interdisciplinary perspective for first-year students. College Teaching, 59 (2), 73-78.,Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.,Manathunga, C., Lant, P., & Mellick, G. (2006). Imagining an interdisciplinary doctoral pedagogy. Teaching in Higher Education, 11 (3), 365-379.,National Science Foundation (NSF). (2004). Interdisciplinary training for undergraduates in biological and mathematical sciences: Program solicitation, http://web.mit.edu/newsofiice/2005/ bcs-dec2.html adresinden 3.10.2010 tarihinde edinilmiştir.,Neumann, R. (2001). Disciplinary differences and university teaching, Studies in Higher Education, 26,135- 146.,Neumann, R., Parry, S., & Becher, T. (2002). Teaching and learning in their disciplinary context. Studies in Higher Education 27,405-417.,Newell, W. (1990). Interdisciplinary curriculum development. Issues in Integrative Studies, 8, 69-86.,Newell, W. (2001). A theory of interdisciplinary studies. Issues in Integrative Studies, 19,1-15.,Newell, W. H. (2007). Decision making in interdisciplinary studies. In G. Morçöl (Ed.), Handbook of decision making (pp. 245-265). New York, NY: Marcel Dekker,Newswander, L. K., & Borrego, M. (2009). Engagement in two interdisciplinary graduate programs. Higher Education, 58, 551-562.,Parker, J. (2002). A New disiplinarity: communities of knowledge, learning and practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 7 (4), 373-386.,Pennee, D. P. (2007). Between cultures: Using curriculum assessment to develop and deliver the integrated core of an arts and sciences program. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 112, 59-67.,Sa, C. (2007). Planning for interdisciplinary research. Planning for Higher Education, 35 (2), 18-28.,Sa, C. (2008). Interdisciplinary strategies in U.S. research universities. Higher Education, 55 (5), 537-552.,Sabancı Üniversitesi (2011). Temel geliştirme programı, http: http.7/www.sabanciuniv.edu/tr/?ogrenim/temel_gelistirme/ temel_gelistirme_kapak/temel_gelistirme_kapak.html adresinden 10.01.2011 tarihinde edinilmiştir.,Shulman, L.S. (1993) Teaching as community property: putting an end to pedagogical solitude. Change, 25 (6), 6-7.,Smart, J., & Ethington, C. (1995) Disciplinary and institutional differences in undergraduate education goals. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 64,49-57.,Sonoma State University (2011). BA degree in liberal arts. http://www.sonoma.edu/ar/admissions/pdf/hutchins.pdf adresinden 10.02.2011 tarihinde edinilmiştir.,Spelt, J. H. E., Biemans, H. J. A., Tobi, H„ Luning, P. A. & Mulder, M. (2009). Teaching and learning in interdisciplinary higher education: A systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 21 (4), 365-378.,Stark, J. S., Lowther, M. A., Benthley, R. J., & Martens, G. G. (1988) Disciplinary differences in course planning. The Review of Higher Education, 13 (2),141-165.,Szostak, R. (2003). Classifying natural and social scientific theories. Current Sociology, 51 (1), 27-49.,Şimşek, H. (1997). 21. yüzyıl eşiğinde paradigmalar savaşı ve kaostaki Türkiye. İstanbul: Sistem Yayıncılık.,Turner, S. (2000). What are disciplines? And how is interdiscip-linarity different? In P. Weingart & N. Stehr (Eds.), Practising interdisciplinary (pp. 46-65). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.,Turner, S. E., & Bowen, W. G. (1990). Ihe flight from the arts and sciences: Trends in degrees conferred. Science, 250 (4980), 517-521. UCLA. (2006). UCLA's institutional proposal to WASC. Retrieved 20 March, 2011 from http://www.wasc.ucla.edu/proposal. shtml.,Ulusoy, G. (2007). Disiplinlerarası araştırma ve eğitim. C. C. Aktan (Ed.), Değişim çağında yüksek öğretim: Global trendler-paradigmalyönelimler içinde (s. 389-398). İzmir: Yasar Üniversitesi.,Van Merrienboer, J. J. G. (1997). Training complex cognitive skills: A four- component instructional design model for technical training. Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology.,Woods, C. (2007). Researching and develoing interdisciplinary teaching: Towards a conceptual framework for classroom communication. Higher Education, 54 (6), 853-866.,Wuff, D. H., & Austin, A. E (Eds.). (2004). Paths to the professoriate: Strategies for enriching the preparation of future faculty. New York: Jossey Bass.
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.indexed.atTRDizin

Files

Collections

TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu