Publication:
Alternative Explanations from Feminist Theories: Towards a Feminist Framework for the Europeanisation Process

dc.contributor.authorCin, Firdevs Melis
dc.contributor.authorSüleymanoğlu-Kürüm, Rahime
dc.contributor.institutionCin, Firdevs Melis, Department of Educational Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom
dc.contributor.institutionSüleymanoğlu-Kürüm, Rahime, Department of Political Science and International Relations, Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi, Istanbul, Turkey
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-05T15:40:40Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractDrawing on the insights of key feminist philosophers (Carole Pateman, Onora O’Neill, Martha Nussbaum, Nancy Fraser and Anne Phillips), this chapter offers a feminist critique to the conditionality and social learning mechanisms which are subsequently conceptualised as interest-driven and norm-driven pathways of Europeanisation. In doing so, the chapter criticises the domestic variables of the models and the lack of gender lenses at the level of EU policymaking. Then, it offers a range of criteria regarding how Europeanisation should be informed by the feminist rationale and lenses and problematises the instrumental and rhetoric gender equality approaches employed by the EU. Hence, we propose an alternative perspective to study Europeanisation to better capture the EU’s impact on gender equality policies on third countries, bring a feminist agenda and perspective to the Europeanisation process and develop analytical tools to help contextualise EU strategies and policies within gender studies. © 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-030-52770-9_4
dc.identifier.endpage84
dc.identifier.issn26625814
dc.identifier.issn26625822
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85100531107
dc.identifier.startpage63
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52770-9_4
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14719/10059
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPalgrave Macmillan
dc.relation.sourceGender and Politics
dc.subject.authorkeywordsConditionality
dc.subject.authorkeywordsEuropeanisation
dc.subject.authorkeywordsFeminist Theory
dc.subject.authorkeywordsGender Equality
dc.subject.authorkeywordsSocialisation
dc.subject.authorkeywordsThe Eu
dc.titleAlternative Explanations from Feminist Theories: Towards a Feminist Framework for the Europeanisation Process
dc.typeBook Chapter
dcterms.referencesMIT Press, (1996), Bretherton, Charlotte, Gender mainstreaming and EU enlargement: Swimming against the tide?, Journal of European Public Policy, 8, 1, pp. 60-81, (2001), Chappell, Louise, Comparing Political Institutions: Revealing the Gendered Logic of Appropriateness, Politics and Gender, 2, 2, pp. 223-235, (2006), Chappell, Louise, New, old, and nested institutions and gender justice outcomes: A view from the international criminal court, Politics and Gender, 10, 4, pp. 572-594, (2014), Chappell, Laura, Understanding the gender regime in the European External Action Service, Cooperation and Conflict, 55, 2, pp. 261-280, (2020), Chiva, Cristina, The limits of europeanisation: EU accession and gender equality in Bulgaria and Romania, Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 10, 2, pp. 195-209, (2009), David, Maxine, Gender and European external relations: Dominant discourses and unintended consequences of gender mainstreaming, Women's Studies International Forum, 39, pp. 53-62, (2013), Promoting Womens Rights Politics of Gender in the European Union, (2004), Elomäki, Anna, The economic case for gender equality in the European Union: Selling gender equality to decision-makers and neoliberalism to women’s organizations, European Journal of Women's Studies, 22, 3, pp. 288-302, (2015), Elomäki, Anna, Theorizing feminist struggles in the triangle of neoliberalism, conservatism, and nationalism, Social Politics, 25, 3, pp. 337-360, (2018)
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.indexed.atScopus
person.identifier.scopus-author-id57215519767
person.identifier.scopus-author-id55249751600

Files