Publication:
Deciding which technology is the best for distance education: Issues in media/technology comparisons studies

dc.contributor.authorYengin, İlker
dc.contributor.authorKarahoca, Adem
dc.contributor.authorKarahoca, Dilek Yiğit
dc.contributor.authorUzunboylu, Hüseyin
dc.contributor.institutionYengin, Ilker, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, United States
dc.contributor.institutionKarahoca, Adem, Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi, Istanbul, Turkey
dc.contributor.institutionKarahoca, Dilek Yiğit, Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi, Istanbul, Turkey
dc.contributor.institutionUzunboylu, Hüseyin, Department of Computer Education and Instructional Technology, Yakın Doğu Üniversitesi, Nicosia, Cyprus
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-05T16:45:25Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.description.abstractDistance education decision makers, who will be shaping the future of distance education, should understand the role of different technologies and their unique attributes closely. In order to achieve this task accurately, they also need to know the superiorities of different technologies to each other. Media comparison studies have been conducted to see these superiorities and to help deciding which technology is better? In some studies researchers make some fundamental errors and flaws in media comparison studies for distance learning. Hence, there is a need to determine these issues in order to make decision process work better. In this review study, issues on media comparison studies in distance education discussed with theoretical backgrounds. Also in this study, reader could find what kind of flaws can occur in media comparisons studies and what cause to these flaws as well as some suggestions to avoid these flaws. In this study, five of the most significant errors scholars have made in writing and discussing distance education research in technology/media comparisons studies are determined. This study aims to help distance education policy makers, distance education researchers and instructors by making them aware of these issues in comparison studies. Hence, they could make a more accurate decision when implementing distance learning solutions in their institutions. © 2010 Published by Elsevier Ltd. © 2011 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.conferenceName1st World Conference on Information Technology, WCIT-2010
dc.identifier.conferencePlaceIstanbul
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.procs.2011.01.020
dc.identifier.endpage1395
dc.identifier.isbn9781510849914
dc.identifier.issn18770509
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-79952528361
dc.identifier.startpage1388
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2011.01.020
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14719/13559
dc.identifier.volume3
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.oastatusAll Open Access
dc.relation.oastatusGold Open Access
dc.relation.sourceProcedia Computer Science
dc.subject.authorkeywordsDistance Education
dc.subject.authorkeywordsMedia Comparison
dc.subject.authorkeywordsComparison Study
dc.subject.authorkeywordsDecision Makers
dc.subject.authorkeywordsDecision Process
dc.subject.authorkeywordsDistance Learning
dc.subject.authorkeywordsEducation Policies
dc.subject.authorkeywordsMedia Comparison
dc.subject.authorkeywordsDecision Making
dc.subject.authorkeywordsDistance Education
dc.subject.authorkeywordsErrors
dc.subject.authorkeywordsInformation Technology
dc.subject.authorkeywordsResearch
dc.subject.authorkeywordsEngineering Education
dc.subject.indexkeywordsComparison study
dc.subject.indexkeywordsDecision makers
dc.subject.indexkeywordsDecision process
dc.subject.indexkeywordsDistance learning
dc.subject.indexkeywordsEducation policies
dc.subject.indexkeywordsMedia comparison
dc.subject.indexkeywordsDecision making
dc.subject.indexkeywordsDistance education
dc.subject.indexkeywordsErrors
dc.subject.indexkeywordsInformation technology
dc.subject.indexkeywordsResearch
dc.subject.indexkeywordsEngineering education
dc.titleDeciding which technology is the best for distance education: Issues in media/technology comparisons studies
dc.typeConference Paper
dcterms.referencesMeasuring Learning Effectiveness A New Look at no Significant Difference Findings, (2000), Clark, Richard E., Media will never influence learning, Educational Technology Research and Development, 42, 2, pp. 21-29, (1994), Kozma, Robert B., Learning with Media, Review of Educational Research, 61, 2, pp. 179-211, (1991), Selepeng-Tau, Ontiretse, Application of computer-based hypermedia in distance education course design, using elaboration theory as a framework, pp. 51-54, (2000), Web Based Instruction, (1997), Dillon, Andrew P., Hypermedia as an educational technology: A review of the quantitative research literature on learner comprehension, control, and style, Review of Educational Research, 68, 3, pp. 322-349, (1998), Journal of Educational Computing Research, (1995), National Science Foundation Directorate for Social Behavioral and Economic Sciences, (2002), Journal of Research on Computing in Education, (1998), Clark, Richard E., Media and method, Educational Technology Research and Development, 42, 3, pp. 7-10, (1994)
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.indexed.atScopus
person.identifier.scopus-author-id14027586500
person.identifier.scopus-author-id57197710803
person.identifier.scopus-author-id14027019900
person.identifier.scopus-author-id14030910200

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Deciding which technology is the best for distance education Issues in mediatechnology comparisons studies.pdf
Size:
208.35 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format