Publication: Deciding which technology is the best for distance education: Issues in media/technology comparisons studies
| dc.contributor.author | Yengin, İlker | |
| dc.contributor.author | Karahoca, Adem | |
| dc.contributor.author | Karahoca, Dilek Yiğit | |
| dc.contributor.author | Uzunboylu, Hüseyin | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Yengin, Ilker, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, United States | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Karahoca, Adem, Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi, Istanbul, Turkey | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Karahoca, Dilek Yiğit, Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi, Istanbul, Turkey | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Uzunboylu, Hüseyin, Department of Computer Education and Instructional Technology, Yakın Doğu Üniversitesi, Nicosia, Cyprus | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-10-05T16:45:25Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Distance education decision makers, who will be shaping the future of distance education, should understand the role of different technologies and their unique attributes closely. In order to achieve this task accurately, they also need to know the superiorities of different technologies to each other. Media comparison studies have been conducted to see these superiorities and to help deciding which technology is better? In some studies researchers make some fundamental errors and flaws in media comparison studies for distance learning. Hence, there is a need to determine these issues in order to make decision process work better. In this review study, issues on media comparison studies in distance education discussed with theoretical backgrounds. Also in this study, reader could find what kind of flaws can occur in media comparisons studies and what cause to these flaws as well as some suggestions to avoid these flaws. In this study, five of the most significant errors scholars have made in writing and discussing distance education research in technology/media comparisons studies are determined. This study aims to help distance education policy makers, distance education researchers and instructors by making them aware of these issues in comparison studies. Hence, they could make a more accurate decision when implementing distance learning solutions in their institutions. © 2010 Published by Elsevier Ltd. © 2011 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved. | |
| dc.identifier.conferenceName | 1st World Conference on Information Technology, WCIT-2010 | |
| dc.identifier.conferencePlace | Istanbul | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.procs.2011.01.020 | |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 1395 | |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 9781510849914 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 18770509 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-79952528361 | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 1388 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2011.01.020 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14719/13559 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 3 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.relation.oastatus | All Open Access | |
| dc.relation.oastatus | Gold Open Access | |
| dc.relation.source | Procedia Computer Science | |
| dc.subject.authorkeywords | Distance Education | |
| dc.subject.authorkeywords | Media Comparison | |
| dc.subject.authorkeywords | Comparison Study | |
| dc.subject.authorkeywords | Decision Makers | |
| dc.subject.authorkeywords | Decision Process | |
| dc.subject.authorkeywords | Distance Learning | |
| dc.subject.authorkeywords | Education Policies | |
| dc.subject.authorkeywords | Media Comparison | |
| dc.subject.authorkeywords | Decision Making | |
| dc.subject.authorkeywords | Distance Education | |
| dc.subject.authorkeywords | Errors | |
| dc.subject.authorkeywords | Information Technology | |
| dc.subject.authorkeywords | Research | |
| dc.subject.authorkeywords | Engineering Education | |
| dc.subject.indexkeywords | Comparison study | |
| dc.subject.indexkeywords | Decision makers | |
| dc.subject.indexkeywords | Decision process | |
| dc.subject.indexkeywords | Distance learning | |
| dc.subject.indexkeywords | Education policies | |
| dc.subject.indexkeywords | Media comparison | |
| dc.subject.indexkeywords | Decision making | |
| dc.subject.indexkeywords | Distance education | |
| dc.subject.indexkeywords | Errors | |
| dc.subject.indexkeywords | Information technology | |
| dc.subject.indexkeywords | Research | |
| dc.subject.indexkeywords | Engineering education | |
| dc.title | Deciding which technology is the best for distance education: Issues in media/technology comparisons studies | |
| dc.type | Conference Paper | |
| dcterms.references | Measuring Learning Effectiveness A New Look at no Significant Difference Findings, (2000), Clark, Richard E., Media will never influence learning, Educational Technology Research and Development, 42, 2, pp. 21-29, (1994), Kozma, Robert B., Learning with Media, Review of Educational Research, 61, 2, pp. 179-211, (1991), Selepeng-Tau, Ontiretse, Application of computer-based hypermedia in distance education course design, using elaboration theory as a framework, pp. 51-54, (2000), Web Based Instruction, (1997), Dillon, Andrew P., Hypermedia as an educational technology: A review of the quantitative research literature on learner comprehension, control, and style, Review of Educational Research, 68, 3, pp. 322-349, (1998), Journal of Educational Computing Research, (1995), National Science Foundation Directorate for Social Behavioral and Economic Sciences, (2002), Journal of Research on Computing in Education, (1998), Clark, Richard E., Media and method, Educational Technology Research and Development, 42, 3, pp. 7-10, (1994) | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| local.indexed.at | Scopus | |
| person.identifier.scopus-author-id | 14027586500 | |
| person.identifier.scopus-author-id | 57197710803 | |
| person.identifier.scopus-author-id | 14027019900 | |
| person.identifier.scopus-author-id | 14030910200 |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- Deciding which technology is the best for distance education Issues in mediatechnology comparisons studies.pdf
- Size:
- 208.35 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
